The Cruel ? of the Old Testament and evil in the Bible
Options
Comments
-
This ? has an unhealthy obsession with king james it's like he does not believe that there are other version of the bible.
The ? of the bible does not condone slavery as we know it
the so called "children" were really young men not 7 years olds
People had to under go circumcision as a sign of their commitment it also set them apart from others.
From gods perspective no one ever dies so he can't really murder and real death does not happen on earth.
And in times of war since he is also a war ? he let the isralites slaughter their enemies all for the greater good
and in his mercy he let some of the women live.
The text is black and white so why lie? If you weren't lying you would quote some scripture.
Do you eat pork? -
And in times of war since he is also a war ? he let the isralites slaughter their enemies all for the greater good
and in his mercy he let some of the women live.
fool.. he let some women live?
no he let "? " women children live to be kept as property by those who did the killing. if it was just about keeping some ppl alive why would it come down to "? " women children to be kept by MEN that just murdered their family? -
And in times of war since he is also a war ? he let the isralites slaughter their enemies all for the greater good
and in his mercy he let some of the women live.
fool.. he let some women live?
no he let "? " women children live to be kept as property by those who did the killing. if it was just about keeping some ppl alive why would it come down to "? " women children to be kept by MEN that just murdered their family?
well young ? women are the easiest women to be kept anyone else would have been a problem later on down the line.
In ancient warfare that's how it was men and boys had to die for obvious reasons and old women are not of much use and they could not be trusted. SO it's wise to keep the young women and ? everyone else. -
This ? has an unhealthy obsession with king james it's like he does not believe that there are other version of the bible.
The ? of the bible does not condone slavery as we know it
the so called "children" were really young men not 7 years olds
People had to under go circumcision as a sign of their commitment it also set them apart from others.
From gods perspective no one ever dies so he can't really murder and real death does not happen on earth.
And in times of war since he is also a war ? he let the isralites slaughter their enemies all for the greater good
and in his mercy he let some of the women live.
The text is black and white so why lie? If you weren't lying you would quote some scripture.
Do you eat pork?
I don't eat pork and never have.
I am not quoting scripture because i don't feel i need to for you,you would just twist it anyway -
And in times of war since he is also a war ? he let the isralites slaughter their enemies all for the greater good
and in his mercy he let some of the women live.
fool.. he let some women live?
no he let "? " women children live to be kept as property by those who did the killing. if it was just about keeping some ppl alive why would it come down to "? " women children to be kept by MEN that just murdered their family?
well young ? women are the easiest women to be kept anyone else would have been a problem later on down the line.
In ancient warfare that's how it was men and boys had to die for obvious reasons and old women are not of much use and they could not be trusted. SO it's wise to keep the young women and ? everyone else.
So there you have it.. Your ? is condoning slavery..
IF you tell a group of men that they can keep "? women" children as property what do you think they going to do with them? Your ? said ? ALL MEN.. ? ALL WOMEN... keep ALIVE "? women children" for yourselves.
Either your ? is condoning slavery or sex slaves. It's either or.
The true divine is not of this demonic type of ? .
Do you have a daughter? How would you feel if you lived in that time and someone said ? said for your ? daughter to be kept alive to be given to his chosen ppl as war plunder after they ? you first?
Is that holy and righteous? -
And in times of war since he is also a war ? he let the isralites slaughter their enemies all for the greater good
and in his mercy he let some of the women live.
fool.. he let some women live?
no he let "? " women children live to be kept as property by those who did the killing. if it was just about keeping some ppl alive why would it come down to "? " women children to be kept by MEN that just murdered their family?
well young ? women are the easiest women to be kept anyone else would have been a problem later on down the line.
In ancient warfare that's how it was men and boys had to die for obvious reasons and old women are not of much use and they could not be trusted. SO it's wise to keep the young women and ? everyone else.
So there you have it.. Your ? is condoning slavery..
IF you tell a group of men that they can keep "? women" children as property what do you think they going to do with them? Your ? said ? ALL MEN.. ? ALL WOMEN... keep ALIVE "? women children" for yourselves.
Either your ? is condoning slavery or sex slaves. It's either or.
The true divine is not of this demonic type of ? .
Do you have a daughter? How would you feel if you lived in that time and someone said ? said for your ? daughter to be kept alive to be given to his chosen ppl as war plunder after they ? you first?
Is that holy and righteous?
Slavery of other people came from war and it was done for the greater good so yes it was righteous. The cannites were an evil people anyway so when they endangered israel ? made an example out of them. -
WAR is not nice and in war especially in the ancient days slaves had to be taken it was either that or ? everybody. ? let the isralites do this for a time and for a reason but that time is over. It's not more complex than that.
-
And in times of war since he is also a war ? he let the isralites slaughter their enemies all for the greater good
and in his mercy he let some of the women live.
fool.. he let some women live?
no he let "? " women children live to be kept as property by those who did the killing. if it was just about keeping some ppl alive why would it come down to "? " women children to be kept by MEN that just murdered their family?
well young ? women are the easiest women to be kept anyone else would have been a problem later on down the line.
In ancient warfare that's how it was men and boys had to die for obvious reasons and old women are not of much use and they could not be trusted. SO it's wise to keep the young women and ? everyone else.
So there you have it.. Your ? is condoning slavery..
IF you tell a group of men that they can keep "? women" children as property what do you think they going to do with them? Your ? said ? ALL MEN.. ? ALL WOMEN... keep ALIVE "? women children" for yourselves.
Either your ? is condoning slavery or sex slaves. It's either or.
The true divine is not of this demonic type of ? .
Do you have a daughter? How would you feel if you lived in that time and someone said ? said for your ? daughter to be kept alive to be given to his chosen ppl as war plunder after they ? you first?
Is that holy and righteous?
Slavery of other people came from war and it was done for the greater good so yes it was righteous. The cannites were an evil people anyway so when they endangered israel ? made an example out of them.
lol this is sad that you believe a wicked act like this is good.. you are calling evil good to suit your indoctrinated belief system.
if it was just about slavery alone then men would of been kept or any women and not so only "? " women "children"
you don't think that "your" ppl are deemed wicked and evil today? so therefore would it be right to take your daughter or niece that's lets say a 13 year old ? and keep them as war plunder?
dude the whole purpose of keeping the "? " children was for sex or slavery point blank period.
what type of child should be kept as property by the same men that just slaughtered their whole family? -
And in times of war since he is also a war ? he let the isralites slaughter their enemies all for the greater good
and in his mercy he let some of the women live.
fool.. he let some women live?
no he let "? " women children live to be kept as property by those who did the killing. if it was just about keeping some ppl alive why would it come down to "? " women children to be kept by MEN that just murdered their family?
well young ? women are the easiest women to be kept anyone else would have been a problem later on down the line.
In ancient warfare that's how it was men and boys had to die for obvious reasons and old women are not of much use and they could not be trusted. SO it's wise to keep the young women and ? everyone else.
So there you have it.. Your ? is condoning slavery..
IF you tell a group of men that they can keep "? women" children as property what do you think they going to do with them? Your ? said ? ALL MEN.. ? ALL WOMEN... keep ALIVE "? women children" for yourselves.
Either your ? is condoning slavery or sex slaves. It's either or.
The true divine is not of this demonic type of ? .
Do you have a daughter? How would you feel if you lived in that time and someone said ? said for your ? daughter to be kept alive to be given to his chosen ppl as war plunder after they ? you first?
Is that holy and righteous?
Slavery of other people came from war and it was done for the greater good so yes it was righteous. The cannites were an evil people anyway so when they endangered israel ? made an example out of them.
lol this is sad that you believe a wicked act like this is good.. you are calling evil good to suit your indoctrinated belief system.
if it was just about slavery alone then men would of been kept or any women and not so only "? " women "children"
you don't think that "your" ppl are deemed wicked and evil today? so therefore would it be right to take your daughter or niece that's lets say a 13 year old ? and keep them as war plunder?
dude the whole purpose of keeping the "? " children was for sex or slavery point blank period.
what type of child should be kept as property by the same men that just slaughtered their whole family?
It was actually an act of mercy. WAR and slavery back then was much more brutal and there were a whole list of laws that regulated slavery that kept it from being to brutal. Today we don't live under the same rules. The people of cannan practiced religious prostitution, ? and had sex with animals.
What should the isralites have done with the children let them die from starvation or be enslaved by some other nation that would have been even more brutal. -
And in times of war since he is also a war ? he let the isralites slaughter their enemies all for the greater good
and in his mercy he let some of the women live.
fool.. he let some women live?
no he let "? " women children live to be kept as property by those who did the killing. if it was just about keeping some ppl alive why would it come down to "? " women children to be kept by MEN that just murdered their family?
well young ? women are the easiest women to be kept anyone else would have been a problem later on down the line.
In ancient warfare that's how it was men and boys had to die for obvious reasons and old women are not of much use and they could not be trusted. SO it's wise to keep the young women and ? everyone else.
So there you have it.. Your ? is condoning slavery..
IF you tell a group of men that they can keep "? women" children as property what do you think they going to do with them? Your ? said ? ALL MEN.. ? ALL WOMEN... keep ALIVE "? women children" for yourselves.
Either your ? is condoning slavery or sex slaves. It's either or.
The true divine is not of this demonic type of ? .
Do you have a daughter? How would you feel if you lived in that time and someone said ? said for your ? daughter to be kept alive to be given to his chosen ppl as war plunder after they ? you first?
Is that holy and righteous?
Slavery of other people came from war and it was done for the greater good so yes it was righteous. The cannites were an evil people anyway so when they endangered israel ? made an example out of them.
lol this is sad that you believe a wicked act like this is good.. you are calling evil good to suit your indoctrinated belief system.
if it was just about slavery alone then men would of been kept or any women and not so only "? " women "children"
you don't think that "your" ppl are deemed wicked and evil today? so therefore would it be right to take your daughter or niece that's lets say a 13 year old ? and keep them as war plunder?
dude the whole purpose of keeping the "? " children was for sex or slavery point blank period.
what type of child should be kept as property by the same men that just slaughtered their whole family?
It was actually an act of mercy. WAR and slavery back then was much more brutal and there were a whole list of laws that regulated slavery that kept it from being to brutal. Today we don't live under the same rules. The people of cannan practiced religious prostitution, ? and had sex with animals.
What should the isralites have done with the children let them die from starvation or be enslaved by some other nation that would have been even more brutal.
so lets put you in the shoes of those killed with this scenario...
you have 3 kids and 1 of them is a ? .. ? commanding his chosen ppl to ? you and your 2 children, but keeping the "? " daughter alive for the killers to keep for themselves as property is an act of mercy?? smh!
you think the women children were happy and excited to be kept as property by the same men that just murdered their whole family? 11 and 13 year old girls at that. smh!
17 Now therefore ? every male among the little ones, and ? every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
-
And in times of war since he is also a war ? he let the isralites slaughter their enemies all for the greater good
and in his mercy he let some of the women live.
fool.. he let some women live?
no he let "? " women children live to be kept as property by those who did the killing. if it was just about keeping some ppl alive why would it come down to "? " women children to be kept by MEN that just murdered their family?
well young ? women are the easiest women to be kept anyone else would have been a problem later on down the line.
In ancient warfare that's how it was men and boys had to die for obvious reasons and old women are not of much use and they could not be trusted. SO it's wise to keep the young women and ? everyone else.
So there you have it.. Your ? is condoning slavery..
IF you tell a group of men that they can keep "? women" children as property what do you think they going to do with them? Your ? said ? ALL MEN.. ? ALL WOMEN... keep ALIVE "? women children" for yourselves.
Either your ? is condoning slavery or sex slaves. It's either or.
The true divine is not of this demonic type of ? .
Do you have a daughter? How would you feel if you lived in that time and someone said ? said for your ? daughter to be kept alive to be given to his chosen ppl as war plunder after they ? you first?
Is that holy and righteous?
Slavery of other people came from war and it was done for the greater good so yes it was righteous. The cannites were an evil people anyway so when they endangered israel ? made an example out of them.
lol this is sad that you believe a wicked act like this is good.. you are calling evil good to suit your indoctrinated belief system.
if it was just about slavery alone then men would of been kept or any women and not so only "? " women "children"
you don't think that "your" ppl are deemed wicked and evil today? so therefore would it be right to take your daughter or niece that's lets say a 13 year old ? and keep them as war plunder?
dude the whole purpose of keeping the "? " children was for sex or slavery point blank period.
what type of child should be kept as property by the same men that just slaughtered their whole family?
It was actually an act of mercy. WAR and slavery back then was much more brutal and there were a whole list of laws that regulated slavery that kept it from being to brutal. Today we don't live under the same rules. The people of cannan practiced religious prostitution, ? and had sex with animals.
What should the isralites have done with the children let them die from starvation or be enslaved by some other nation that would have been even more brutal.
so lets put you in the shoes of those killed with this scenario...
you have 3 kids and 1 of them is a ? .. ? commanding his chosen ppl to ? you and your 2 children, but keeping the "? " daughter alive for the killers to keep for themselves as property is an act of mercy?? smh!
you think the women children were happy and excited to be kept as property by the same men that just murdered their whole family? 11 and 13 year old girls at that. smh!
17 Now therefore ? every male among the little ones, and ? every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
At 13 and 11 they would get over it in time and besides if i was a cannite i probably would have ended up ? my 13 year old anyway. -
It was war ? happens. I would rather my daughter become a slave to a people that would at least give her some rights than to have her stave to death or be eaten by wild animals or be enslaved by worse people.
-
this religion ? has got ppl's minds ? up.. so damn blinded that this ? is calling evil good.
-
this religion ? has got ppl's minds ? up.. so damn blinded that this ? is calling evil good.
Who are you to decide what is evil and what is good ? -
alissowack wrote: »alissowack wrote: »You just reiterated my point. You think that Christians think that the Bible is a primary source of how to live...so you argue against it...when that is not what the Bible is about.
Again...it's not about quotes. It is your perspective.
are you looking for a reasons to comment?
this is why non believers usually know the Bible better than believers.
Joshua 1:8
This book of the law shall not depart out of thy mouth; but thou shalt meditate therein day and night, that thou mayest observe to do according to all that is written therein: for then thou shalt make thy way prosperous, and then thou shalt have good success.
Deuteronomy 6:6-9
6 And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart:
7 And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up.
8 And thou shalt bind them for a sign upon thine hand, and they shall be as frontlets between thine eyes.
9 And thou shalt write them upon the posts of thy house, and on thy gates.
Deuteronomy 11:18-21
18 Therefore shall ye lay up these my words in your heart and in your soul, and bind them for a sign upon your hand, that they may be as frontlets between your eyes.
19 And ye shall teach them your children, speaking of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, when thou liest down, and when thou risest up.
20 And thou shalt write them upon the door posts of thine house, and upon thy gates:
You are looking at a tree and calling it a forest. Of course there are passages that stress how to live, but it is not the big picture. Jesus is the big picture.
Do you eat pork?
I don't particularly see the relevance in asking this question. There are things in my lifetime that I have been a part of that maybe have done more harm than good to my health. There are things I wish I've done to give myself a fighting chance in living long in this world. However, my health and well being pales in comparison to the big picture. -
he's bringing up pork eating so he can go into his twisted understanding of isaiah 66: 16-17
he thinks it's a prophecy that all pork eaters are going to go to hell. -
because I have knowledge of good and evil and I am the temple of ? ..
you KJV believers think the Bible is the temple of ? and the spirit of ? is in the Bible.. 1 Corinthians 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of ? , and that the Spirit of ? dwelleth in you?
-
because I have knowledge of good and evil and I am the temple of ? ..
you KJV believers think the Bible is the temple of ? and the spirit of ? is in the Bible.. 1 Corinthians 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of ? , and that the Spirit of ? dwelleth in you?
For the 100000000 time there is more than one translation of the bible and i personally don't believe that the klv is the perfect one. The bible is not the temple of ? the body is the temple of ? . -
because I have knowledge of good and evil and I am the temple of ? ..
you KJV believers think the Bible is the temple of ? and the spirit of ? is in the Bible.. 1 Corinthians 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of ? , and that the Spirit of ? dwelleth in you?
For the 100000000 time there is more than one translation of the bible and i personally don't believe that the klv is the perfect one. The bible is not the temple of ? the body is the temple of ? .
lol you finally starting to speak truth. -
because I have knowledge of good and evil and I am the temple of ? ..
you KJV believers think the Bible is the temple of ? and the spirit of ? is in the Bible.. 1 Corinthians 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of ? , and that the Spirit of ? dwelleth in you?
For the 100000000 time there is more than one translation of the bible and i personally don't believe that the klv is the perfect one. The bible is not the temple of ? the body is the temple of ? .
lol you finally starting to speak truth.
I've been speaking the truth you are either too stupid to understand me or your hate of ? has blinded you -
because I have knowledge of good and evil and I am the temple of ? ..
you KJV believers think the Bible is the temple of ? and the spirit of ? is in the Bible.. 1 Corinthians 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of ? , and that the Spirit of ? dwelleth in you?
Your perspective on this verse is the same as that of the hypocrite preacher who tries to promote prosperity to his (or her) followers; that ? thinks they are "special". All of mankind still has to deal with sin whether righteous or unrighteous. -
because I have knowledge of good and evil and I am the temple of ? ..
you KJV believers think the Bible is the temple of ? and the spirit of ? is in the Bible.. 1 Corinthians 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of ? , and that the Spirit of ? dwelleth in you?
For the 100000000 time there is more than one translation of the bible and i personally don't believe that the klv is the perfect one. The bible is not the temple of ? the body is the temple of ? .
lol you finally starting to speak truth.
I've been speaking the truth you are either too stupid to understand me or your hate of ? has blinded you
your ? is not my ? and I don't hate anyone or anything. Don't take truth as hate.
The divine source of life is my ? . -
alissowack wrote: »
because I have knowledge of good and evil and I am the temple of ? ..
you KJV believers think the Bible is the temple of ? and the spirit of ? is in the Bible.. 1 Corinthians 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of ? , and that the Spirit of ? dwelleth in you?
Your perspective on this verse is the same as that of the hypocrite preacher who tries to promote prosperity to his (or her) followers; that ? thinks they are "special". All of mankind still has to deal with sin whether righteous or unrighteous.
where do you get talking on sin from? that's a whole other subject from what my post was about. -
alissowack wrote: »
because I have knowledge of good and evil and I am the temple of ? ..
you KJV believers think the Bible is the temple of ? and the spirit of ? is in the Bible.. 1 Corinthians 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of ? , and that the Spirit of ? dwelleth in you?
Your perspective on this verse is the same as that of the hypocrite preacher who tries to promote prosperity to his (or her) followers; that ? thinks they are "special". All of mankind still has to deal with sin whether righteous or unrighteous.
where do you get talking on sin from? that's a whole other subject from what my post was about.
Well...sin has a lot to do with what the Bible is about whether you want to make it the subject of conversation or not. You take that out, then ? 's actions upon mankind in the Bible are baseless. Sin is the problem and morals are not going to fix it. -
alissowack wrote: »alissowack wrote: »
because I have knowledge of good and evil and I am mthe temple of ? ..
you KJV believers think the Bible is the temple of ? and the spirit of ? is in the Bible.. 1 Corinthians 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of ? , and that the Spirit of ? dwelleth in you?
Your perspective on this verse is the same as that of the hypocrite preacher who tries to promote prosperity to his (or her) followers; that ? thinks they are "special". All of mankind still has to deal with sin whether righteous or unrighteous.
where do you get talking on sin from? that's a whole other subject from what my post was about.
Well...sin has a lot to do with what the Bible is about whether you want to make it the subject of conversation or not. You take that out, then ? 's actions upon mankind in the Bible are baseless. Sin is the problem and morals are not going to fix it.
this topic has nothing to do with sin. if thats wat u want tp talk about then make a thread
