Why is selling P@ssy morally and ethically wrong?
Options
Comments
-
dont sell me no broke down ?
-
@BlackCat and what in bakers ? wrong with your angles in pics? You can't be in da middle ? You take pics like a cute chubby chick
-
Ain't nothing wrong with being a cute chubby chick!
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
Black_Samson wrote: »Two words
Disease Control.
Super gonorrhea would have been here by the 80's had prostitution not been illegal.
Pretty sure we would have accelerated the mutations in alot of them STI's
didnt we already talk about this?? lol -
Ain't nothing wrong with being a cute chubby chick!
Depends on who you asking sweetheart -
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
Like your face looking like a Chihuahua?
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
There is nothing wrong with prostitution with mutual consent.
Decriminalize prostitution. -
funny i dont remember it that way..Black_Samson wrote: »Black_Samson wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »Black_Samson wrote: »Two words
Disease Control.
Super gonorrhea would have been here by the 80's had prostitution not been illegal.
Pretty sure we would have accelerated the mutations in alot of them STI's
didnt we already talk about this?? lol
And i destroyed you then as well.
I strongly encourage you to look at France during the Victorian Era.
And Rome.
and please dont reference times of openly ? love affairs and orgies..
and please believe hoes is protectin themselves moreso then these square ? ..
yall the nasty muthafuckas. lol -
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
I'm not Stew....wrong guy
-
Black_Samson wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »
funny i dont remember it that way..Black_Samson wrote: »Black_Samson wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »Black_Samson wrote: »Two words
Disease Control.
Super gonorrhea would have been here by the 80's had prostitution not been illegal.
Pretty sure we would have accelerated the mutations in alot of them STI's
didnt we already talk about this?? lol
And i destroyed you then as well.
I strongly encourage you to look at France during the Victorian Era.
And Rome.
and please dont reference times of openly ? love affairs and orgies..
and please believe hoes is protectin themselves moreso then these square ? ..
yall the nasty muthafuckas. lol
Them damn latent stages...
yeh.. i know how them square ? think.. "he cute.. he must be clean.."
or the worse.. "i dont see any bumps.. *gobble gobble gobble*"
iv turned out quite a few ? ..
they thanked me for savin their health..
do ? from ur side of the field even get regular checkups?? lol
disease control my ass..
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
Damn my phone always messing ? up
-
-
BOSSExcellence wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »So you wouldn't care if you peoples (any female fam) was out there making money ? random ? ?
btw females are very emotional people ...and honestly look at sex different then guys... so the ones that do usually have mental or emotional issues...
my ? ..
u said ud suck ? for money for ur kids if the situation called for it..
ur the last to be talkin in this thread..
id think ud be THE FIRST to bat for these ? .. wouldve thought ud be the one who understood these ? more then.. these ? . lol
? get out yo ? feelings... smh fishing for lol's... hey you got a couple happy?
-
BOSSExcellence wrote: »but lemme get this straight..
a ? ? random dudes for money she has emotional issues... but if she was to say.. do it "jus cause" then she's mentally stable??
gottit..
no... she still a thot... -
damobb2deep wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »So you wouldn't care if you peoples (any female fam) was out there making money ? random ? ?
btw females are very emotional people ...and honestly look at sex different then guys... so the ones that do usually have mental or emotional issues...
my ? ..
u said ud suck ? for money for ur kids if the situation called for it..
ur the last to be talkin in this thread..
id think ud be THE FIRST to bat for these ? .. wouldve thought ud be the one who understood these ? more then.. these ? . lol
? get out yo ? feelings... smh fishing for lol's... hey you got a couple happy?
nah.. if anything u the one in ur feelings..
when have i ever fished for "lol's"??
when i post i simply say what the ? it is..
I'm sorry my truths comes off humorous to others...
but like i said.. ? .. u said ud suck did if u was desperate..
alot of prostitutes.. and i mean ALOT.. are desperate and suck ? ..
so how am i fishin for saying i would've thought ud understand some of these girls predicament??
-
damobb2deep wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »but lemme get this straight..
a ? ? random dudes for money she has emotional issues... but if she was to say.. do it "jus cause" then she's mentally stable??
gottit..
no... she still a thot...
so basically ur saying ? are emotionally unstable PERIOD..
some jus choose to get paid then??
and we looking down on hoes why?? -
well if you follow the deontological line of ethics it violates the categorical imperative where you must treat yourself and others as not as a means to an end but as the end itself. basically, it reduces a person to an object
See that's thing about deontology, one is stringently bound by the rules. Rules formed by subjective thought and many cases in rooted in religious dogma.
By the way the creator of the categorical imperative, Immanuel Kant, was severely critical of sexuality. In fact he was a proud, life long celibate and purportedly died a ? . Kant's categorical imperative also posited that having sex for enjoyment was wrong, just as prostitution and ? (in fact he believed ? was worse than suicide.)
-
? I wasn't even dissing lol...just statiing facts.
I pmed her tho ,maybe she will be more nice
![[Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/15efd8efe08bb34aae25f1808aaf5018.svg)
