Jurassic World (2015)

Options
1234568

Comments

  • HustleThaDon
    HustleThaDon Members Posts: 28,566 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Wanted the little boy to die he was annoying as ? . Other than that it was straight took to long to get to the good ? .
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bcotton5
    Bcotton5 Members Posts: 51,851 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    I love raptors
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bcotton5
    Bcotton5 Members Posts: 51,851 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    This DVD quality leaked online a few days ago too
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bcotton5
    Bcotton5 Members Posts: 51,851 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    T Rex still the king of dinosaurs
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • nujerz84
    nujerz84 Members Posts: 15,418 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Imo saw it during vacation with family in Charlotte 3 weeks ago as expected trash.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • lord nemesis
    lord nemesis Members Posts: 11,946 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Glad I bootlegged it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • JDSTAYWITIT
    JDSTAYWITIT Members Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    lord nemesis wrote: »
    Glad I bootlegged it.

    Feel me?



    One of the most ridiculous rehashed piece of trash cinematic efforts that I've seen in some time ....what is the purpose of this movie? ? was terrible from plot to acting to ? ass over produced effects ..... If you want a real summer block buster thriller do yourself a favor and watch that Mad Max .... No that's some real ? ?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • (ob)Scene
    (ob)Scene Members Posts: 4,729 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    JDSTAYWITIT. wrote: »
    lord nemesis wrote: »
    Glad I bootlegged it.

    Feel me?



    One of the most ridiculous rehashed piece of trash cinematic efforts that I've seen in some time ....what is the purpose of this movie? ? was terrible from plot to acting to ? ass over produced effects ..... If you want a real summer block buster thriller do yourself a favor and watch that Mad Max .... No that's some real ? ?

    Which effects did you believe to be overproduced?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • texas409
    texas409 Members Posts: 20,854 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    oh now ? hate the movie
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • lamontbdc
    lamontbdc Members Posts: 18,824 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    ? was just ok ...watched it yesterday...? was a slow start and i dam near fell asleep at the beginning
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BangEm_Bart
    BangEm_Bart Members Posts: 9,503 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    It was a good popcorn flick. It was exactly how I expected it to be. It wasn't trash, just decent and predictable.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • JDSTAYWITIT
    JDSTAYWITIT Members Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    (ob)Scene wrote: »
    JDSTAYWITIT. wrote: »
    lord nemesis wrote: »
    Glad I bootlegged it.

    Feel me?



    One of the most ridiculous rehashed piece of trash cinematic efforts that I've seen in some time ....what is the purpose of this movie? ? was terrible from plot to acting to ? ass over produced effects ..... If you want a real summer block buster thriller do yourself a favor and watch that Mad Max .... No that's some real ? ?

    Which effects did you believe to be overproduced?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R60ElTKJCC4#t=1m09s


    I mean ? ... if were going to be just outlandish why not just give the ? trex a rocket pack and have him blast into space terrorizing moon people ... lmao ... ? if your going to do over produced ? like this why not just make it artistically palatable by going full satire? ... the movie starts down that path as it has moments were it ironically makes fun of "stereotypical" action film tropes ... only to go back and fall victim of the same things it mocked... lol ... ? was terrible .. it really was ... uninspired... unimaginative .... disengaging garbage .... the summer blockbuster shouldn't have to be this contrived ... ? invisible dinosaurs? lmaooooo ....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Already Home_17
    Already Home_17 Members Posts: 14,572 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    JDSTAYWITIT. wrote: »
    lord nemesis wrote: »
    Glad I bootlegged it.

    Feel me?



    One of the most ridiculous rehashed piece of trash cinematic efforts that I've seen in some time ....what is the purpose of this movie? ? was terrible from plot to acting to ? ass over produced effects ..... If you want a real summer block buster thriller do yourself a favor and watch that Mad Max .... No that's some real ? ?

    how can you criticize a movie for being rehashed, then recommend a reboot?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • (ob)Scene
    (ob)Scene Members Posts: 4,729 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 2015
    Options
    JDSTAYWITIT. wrote: »
    (ob)Scene wrote: »
    JDSTAYWITIT. wrote: »
    lord nemesis wrote: »
    Glad I bootlegged it.

    Feel me?



    One of the most ridiculous rehashed piece of trash cinematic efforts that I've seen in some time ....what is the purpose of this movie? ? was terrible from plot to acting to ? ass over produced effects ..... If you want a real summer block buster thriller do yourself a favor and watch that Mad Max .... No that's some real ? ?

    Which effects did you believe to be overproduced?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R60ElTKJCC4#t=1m09s


    I mean ? ... if were going to be just outlandish why not just give the ? trex a rocket pack and have him blast into space terrorizing moon people ... lmao ... ? if your going to do over produced ? like this why not just make it artistically palatable by going full satire? ... the movie starts down that path as it has moments were it ironically makes fun of "stereotypical" action film tropes ... only to go back and fall victim of the same things it mocked... lol ... ? was terrible .. it really was ... uninspired... unimaginative .... disengaging garbage .... the summer blockbuster shouldn't have to be this contrived ... ? invisible dinosaurs? lmaooooo ....

    Invisible? You do know it was using camouflage and lowering it's body temperature to avoid being easily eyed? There are numerous animals that still exist today that have those very same traits. That was the whole point of it being a genetically engineered dinosaur.
    And I read that they purposely oversized the aquatic dinosaur so that the ? would be believable when it dragged the Indomnius Rex into the water.

    I had no qualms with any of it. I don't agree with your assessment of the film b/c while it didn't tackle the physical appearances of every dinosaur with 100% accuracy (ie. feathers on Raptors), it still was a lot more grounded than just about every other blockbuster we've been presented the past half decade or so.

    They said the only reason that some of the dinosaurs weren't 100% true to what we now believed they were is b/c they wanted to maintain the continuity from the previous films where we didn't possess anywhere near as much knowledge on the topic as we do now.

    And they wyling out with all that math in the video. Ain't never that serious.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • JDSTAYWITIT
    JDSTAYWITIT Members Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Already Home_17 wrote: »
    JDSTAYWITIT. wrote: »
    lord nemesis wrote: »
    Glad I bootlegged it.

    Feel me?



    One of the most ridiculous rehashed piece of trash cinematic efforts that I've seen in some time ....what is the purpose of this movie? ? was terrible from plot to acting to ? ass over produced effects ..... If you want a real summer block buster thriller do yourself a favor and watch that Mad Max .... No that's some real ? ?

    how can you criticize a movie for being rehashed, then recommend a reboot?


    re·hash

    verb
    gerund or present participle: rehashing

    rēˈhaSH/

    put (old ideas or material) into a new form ...without significant change or improvement.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Already Home_17
    Already Home_17 Members Posts: 14,572 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 2015
    Options
    both are reboots whose stories arent that much different from the original entries

    i havent heard 1 person say the latest JP and MM movies were better than the original, so based on the definition you provided both films would be guilty of such
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • JDSTAYWITIT
    JDSTAYWITIT Members Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    (ob)Scene wrote: »
    JDSTAYWITIT. wrote: »
    (ob)Scene wrote: »
    JDSTAYWITIT. wrote: »
    lord nemesis wrote: »
    Glad I bootlegged it.

    Feel me?



    One of the most ridiculous rehashed piece of trash cinematic efforts that I've seen in some time ....what is the purpose of this movie? ? was terrible from plot to acting to ? ass over produced effects ..... If you want a real summer block buster thriller do yourself a favor and watch that Mad Max .... No that's some real ? ?

    Which effects did you believe to be overproduced?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R60ElTKJCC4#t=1m09s


    I mean ? ... if were going to be just outlandish why not just give the ? trex a rocket pack and have him blast into space terrorizing moon people ... lmao ... ? if your going to do over produced ? like this why not just make it artistically palatable by going full satire? ... the movie starts down that path as it has moments were it ironically makes fun of "stereotypical" action film tropes ... only to go back and fall victim of the same things it mocked... lol ... ? was terrible .. it really was ... uninspired... unimaginative .... disengaging garbage .... the summer blockbuster shouldn't have to be this contrived ... ? invisible dinosaurs? lmaooooo ....

    Invisible? You do know it was using camouflage and lowering it's body temperature to avoid being easily eyed? There are numerous animals that still exist today that have those very same traits. That was the whole point of it being a genetically engineered dinosaur.
    And I read that they purposely oversized the aquatic dinosaur so that the ? would be believable when it dragged the Indomnius Rex into the water.

    I had no qualms with any of it. I don't agree with your assessment of the film b/c while it didn't tackle the physical appearances of every dinosaur with 100% accuracy (ie. feathers on Raptors), it still was a lot more grounded than just about every other blockbuster we've been presented the past half decade or so.

    They said the only reason that some of the dinosaurs weren't 100% true to what we now believed they were is b/c they wanted to maintain the continuity from the previous films where we didn't possess anywhere near as much knowledge on the topic as we do now.

    And they wyling out with all that math in the video. Ain't never that serious.

    If a film leaves you comparing the feasibility of a small iguana or a butterfly or a bird being able to cloak themselves as to avoid detection to that of a 50 ? foot 10 ton beast like you just did ...I would say that movie has failed any rational persons sensibilities ....


    Just because the producers give some half baked ass rationale behind the different ? on display in this movie doesn't mean any of the ? is less than ........well .....? .....(*and I don't give a ? I'm giving up spoilers*) just like the scene you mentioned... lol @ "believable ending"....now .... how the ? can that be described as anything less than gratuitous? That whole scene epitomized the the desperation this movie gushes... Now in that scene the 600 foot jumping water beast bust out of its containment with absolute ease to DEVASTATINGLY DEVOUR!!!!!! Indominus Rex!!!! Ohhhhh yeaaaaaa brother the SAVAGERY!!! ....but just at the beginning of the movie the filmmakers want us to believe that same housing barrier would suffice containing that ? thing from real live human attraction seekers during the shark eating exhibition???? WTF??? Lol ...but hey who cares ...see with a ? movie like this it doesn't matter how far you have to suspend practicality for the shock reaction ..just do it baby!! Same goes for this pale broad running around the whole movie ducking T-Rex's in a pair of got damn jimmy choo's lmaooo ...

    I mean got damn ..even within the context of a film about reanimated dinosaurs you still need some semblance of theatrical logic or else as I said you might as well have "genetically modified" rocket powered raptors terrorizing the Galaxy .... I mean why not? from your demeanor it seems as tho people would find that thrilling!! In fact I think that should be the next movie ... I can see it now


    JURASSIC PARK GALAXY S5(presented by Samsung)
    "LOST SPACE...........THE MARS EDITION"

    classic!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • JDSTAYWITIT
    JDSTAYWITIT Members Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 2015
    Options
    Already Home_17 wrote: »
    both are reboots whose stories arent that much different from the original entries

    i havent heard 1 person say the latest JP and MM movies were better than the original, so based on the definition you provided both films would be guilty of such
    Hmmm...
    1yn628.jpg
    2hp0mt0.jpg
    mbmgrk.jpg


    something looking funny in da light B ...... its lookin funny in da light doe! 35 year old movie looking just as good as a movie dropped in 2015?? ohhh worrrd my niggy?? is that right?? ...... da light doooooeee!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • JDSTAYWITIT
    JDSTAYWITIT Members Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    now lets look at JP...

    awuyjo.jpg
    244tbtj.jpg


    Now .... ill let you try again in figuring out which movie this definition best fits

    re·hash
    verb
    rēˈhaSH/
    1.
    put (old ideas or material) into a new form without significant change or improvement.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Already Home_17
    Already Home_17 Members Posts: 14,572 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    oh look, screen shots
    I guess that means I physically heard someone say "MM fury road was better than the original"

    since apparently seeing pictures equates to hearing now

    I stand corrected
    no sarcasm
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • JDSTAYWITIT
    JDSTAYWITIT Members Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Already Home_17 wrote: »
    oh look, screen shots
    I guess that means I physically heard someone say "MM fury road was better than the original"

    since apparently seeing pictures equates to hearing now

    I stand corrected
    no sarcasm

    what a ? idiot ...lol
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Huey_C
    Huey_C Members Posts: 3,539 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    ? if u don't like the movie cool but ? nobody cares
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Already Home_17
    Already Home_17 Members Posts: 14,572 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    JDSTAYWITIT. wrote: »
    Already Home_17 wrote: »
    oh look, screen shots
    I guess that means I physically heard someone say "MM fury road was better than the original"

    since apparently seeing pictures equates to hearing now

    I stand corrected
    no sarcasm

    what a ? idiot ...lol

    the traits of a ? are present in your posts
    ? you and your little Microsoft paint project ?

    anigif_optimized-18089-1435615618-1.gif
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Categories