Wrestlemania 32
Options
KillaCham
Members, Moderators Posts: 11,417 Regulator
Aight we def need a thread for this already (will merge with official PPV thread later)
WWE Divas Championship // Triple Threat Match
Charolette vs. Sasha Banks vs. Becky Lynch
Intercontinental Champion // Ladder Match
Kevin Owens vs. Sami Zayn vs. Dolph Ziggler vs. Zack Ryder vs. Sin Cara vs. The Miz vs. Stardust
United States Championship
Kalisto vs. Ryback
WWE Tag Team Championships
The New Day vs. The League of Nations
AJ Styles vs. Chris Jericho
The 3rd annual Andre the Giant Memorial Battle Royal
The Usos vs. The Dudley Boyz
The Total Divas vs. B.A.D. & Blonde
WWE Divas Championship // Triple Threat Match
Charolette vs. Sasha Banks vs. Becky Lynch
Intercontinental Champion // Ladder Match
Kevin Owens vs. Sami Zayn vs. Dolph Ziggler vs. Zack Ryder vs. Sin Cara vs. The Miz vs. Stardust
United States Championship
Kalisto vs. Ryback
WWE Tag Team Championships
The New Day vs. The League of Nations
AJ Styles vs. Chris Jericho
The 3rd annual Andre the Giant Memorial Battle Royal
The Usos vs. The Dudley Boyz
The Total Divas vs. B.A.D. & Blonde
Comments
-
Damn a whole new thread for Mania??
No hate -
-
-
Lol I'm gonna merge it soon. Don't want to take away from the Fast Lane discussion yet though.Damn a whole new thread for Mania??
No hate -
Don't merge it until after Wrestlemania. You gotta let it ride.
-
nh but you can see the chest muscles of all the losers
-
Why did you notice that?? Lmaoooooonh but you can see the chest muscles of all the losers -
-
-
-
I was just laughing at how one ? is shirtless in all the pics, but taker technically still has a shirt on... Man I can't believe i posted that ?
-
I was just laughing at how one ? is shirtless in all the pics, but taker technically still has a shirt on... Man I can't believe i posted that ?
Your avi not helping your case bruh -
I'm happy this thread is called wr wrestlemania 32 and not just plain old wrestlemania. Smh at wwe stopping with the numbers
-
silverfoxx wrote: »
lol whatever... none of yall can unsee it either now.... smh -
I'm curious to see how people who don't like the card right now, more specifically Shane/Taker, would book WrestleMania differently.
-
I'm curious to see how people who don't like the card right now, more specifically Shane/Taker, would book WrestleMania differently.
Triple H vs Reigns is good, they've been building towards this match since 2014, so it makes sense.
Ambrose vs Lesnar- can't wait!!!!!
Undertaker vs Shane McMahon is a waste of the Undertaker, he doesn't have that many matches left in him and he can no longer carry a match and Shane can't physically bump like he used to given his age and the fact that he hasn't wrestled since 2006. Part timer vs part timer accomplishes nothing long term, at least Ambrose and Reigns two active guys are getting a rub by being involved with guys like HHH and Brock. You want to create new stars and I feel that a younger talent could've benefitted more by being in this spot.
They knew Cena was going to miss this WM, so my plan would've been to build up Kevin Owens and have him do a bunch of vignettes (think of Austin's vignettes from 1996 calling out Bret Hart leading up to SS) then Taker appears and answers Owens months of taunting by accepting his challenge. Owens gets a chance to mix it up with a guy like Taker.
Option number 2 the unpopular option. Sheamus. We really do not want to see Taker vs Sheamus, but there has been many feuds over the course of the past years that we've initially didn't want to see but the WWE did a good job booking the storyline and it became interesting. Sheamus is the most accomplished guy on the roster that Taker has never faced. He was coming off a solid WWE World Title run, instead of killing his momentum, they could've kept building him up even after he lost the belt to Reigns.
Those are two realistic options. -
it seems like wwe wants the IC title defended at WM. there's no need for taker or brock to challenge for that title.
owens vs taker sounds like a great feud though, especially if biker taker was still around
their promos would be etherous -
We should all wait and see how this taker vs Shane match plays out
-
the idea of owens calling out taker is really good tho
-
-
Shane o mac in shape
-
Solid card so far
-
man i don't see how anyone can be mad at shane vs taker....
the build up is going to be great....
-
I like the Kevin Owens idea. Either that or Finn Balor would be interesting to me. Bad timing for FInn, though. They'd have to rush with (most likely) getting the title off of him, pushing him to the main roster, and developing a real story. Some of Undertaker's best ring chemistry is with smaller/quicker wrestlers like HBK, Randy, CM Punk, Edge.5th Letter wrote: »I'm curious to see how people who don't like the card right now, more specifically Shane/Taker, would book WrestleMania differently.
Triple H vs Reigns is good, they've been building towards this match since 2014, so it makes sense.
Ambrose vs Lesnar- can't wait!!!!!
Undertaker vs Shane McMahon is a waste of the Undertaker, he doesn't have that many matches left in him and he can no longer carry a match and Shane can't physically bump like he used to given his age and the fact that he hasn't wrestled since 2006. Part timer vs part timer accomplishes nothing long term, at least Ambrose and Reigns two active guys are getting a rub by being involved with guys like HHH and Brock. You want to create new stars and I feel that a younger talent could've benefitted more by being in this spot.
They knew Cena was going to miss this WM, so my plan would've been to build up Kevin Owens and have him do a bunch of vignettes (think of Austin's vignettes from 1996 calling out Bret Hart leading up to SS) then Taker appears and answers Owens months of taunting by accepting his challenge. Owens gets a chance to mix it up with a guy like Taker.
Option number 2 the unpopular option. Sheamus. We really do not want to see Taker vs Sheamus, but there has been many feuds over the course of the past years that we've initially didn't want to see but the WWE did a good job booking the storyline and it became interesting. Sheamus is the most accomplished guy on the roster that Taker has never faced. He was coming off a solid WWE World Title run, instead of killing his momentum, they could've kept building him up even after he lost the belt to Reigns.
Those are two realistic options.
Sheamus is a terrible idea IMO lolol -
I like the Kevin Owens idea. Either that or Finn Balor would be interesting to me. Bad timing for FInn, though. They'd have to rush with (most likely) getting the title off of him, pushing him to the main roster, and developing a real story. Some of Undertaker's best ring chemistry is with smaller/quicker wrestlers like HBK, Randy, CM Punk, Edge.5th Letter wrote: »I'm curious to see how people who don't like the card right now, more specifically Shane/Taker, would book WrestleMania differently.
Triple H vs Reigns is good, they've been building towards this match since 2014, so it makes sense.
Ambrose vs Lesnar- can't wait!!!!!
Undertaker vs Shane McMahon is a waste of the Undertaker, he doesn't have that many matches left in him and he can no longer carry a match and Shane can't physically bump like he used to given his age and the fact that he hasn't wrestled since 2006. Part timer vs part timer accomplishes nothing long term, at least Ambrose and Reigns two active guys are getting a rub by being involved with guys like HHH and Brock. You want to create new stars and I feel that a younger talent could've benefitted more by being in this spot.
They knew Cena was going to miss this WM, so my plan would've been to build up Kevin Owens and have him do a bunch of vignettes (think of Austin's vignettes from 1996 calling out Bret Hart leading up to SS) then Taker appears and answers Owens months of taunting by accepting his challenge. Owens gets a chance to mix it up with a guy like Taker.
Option number 2 the unpopular option. Sheamus. We really do not want to see Taker vs Sheamus, but there has been many feuds over the course of the past years that we've initially didn't want to see but the WWE did a good job booking the storyline and it became interesting. Sheamus is the most accomplished guy on the roster that Taker has never faced. He was coming off a solid WWE World Title run, instead of killing his momentum, they could've kept building him up even after he lost the belt to Reigns.
Those are two realistic options.
Sheamus is a terrible idea IMO lolol
Nobody wants to Sheamus I agree but they've took many feuds that no one wanted to see and made it interesting so I think it could work.
