Top 10 black QB's of all time

Options
13

Comments

  • 5 Grand
    5 Grand Members Posts: 12,869 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    No ones wants to be Charles Barkley, but your logic still dumb as hell when it comes to these NFL QBs.

    Explain why you'd rather be Robert Horry than Charles Barkley!
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    No ones wants to be Charles Barkley, but your logic still dumb as hell when it comes to these NFL QBs.

    Explain why you'd rather be Robert Horry than Charles Barkley!

    Barkley could have 10 titles and no one would still wanna he that ? . Why you yellin, lol.

    Face facts, ya logic is lousy.
    aneed123 wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    i aint ask who u rather b i asked who is the better player

    OK forget about Robert Horry and Charles Barkley.

    Who would you rather be, Doug Williams or Dan Marino?
  • Trollio
    Trollio Members Posts: 25,815 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    5 grand would take Steve kerr over steph curry
  • 5 Grand
    5 Grand Members Posts: 12,869 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Trollio wrote: »
    5 grand would take Steve kerr over steph curry

    They both have rings.

    Give me a better example.

    At the end of the day would you rather win a Superbowl or not win a Superbowl?
  • numbaz...80's baby
    numbaz...80's baby Members Posts: 5,104 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
  • aneed123
    aneed123 Members Posts: 23,763 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    No ones wants to be Charles Barkley, but your logic still dumb as hell when it comes to these NFL QBs.

    Explain why you'd rather be Robert Horry than Charles Barkley!
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    No ones wants to be Charles Barkley, but your logic still dumb as hell when it comes to these NFL QBs.

    Explain why you'd rather be Robert Horry than Charles Barkley!

    Barkley could have 10 titles and no one would still wanna he that ? . Why you yellin, lol.

    Face facts, ya logic is lousy.
    aneed123 wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    i aint ask who u rather b i asked who is the better player

    OK forget about Robert Horry and Charles Barkley.

    Who would you rather be, Doug Williams or Dan Marino?

    dan marino fool lol
  • White_Owl_Willie
    White_Owl_Willie Members Posts: 220 ✭✭
    Options
    aneed123 wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    No ones wants to be Charles Barkley, but your logic still dumb as hell when it comes to these NFL QBs.

    Explain why you'd rather be Robert Horry than Charles Barkley!
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    No ones wants to be Charles Barkley, but your logic still dumb as hell when it comes to these NFL QBs.

    Explain why you'd rather be Robert Horry than Charles Barkley!

    Barkley could have 10 titles and no one would still wanna he that ? . Why you yellin, lol.

    Face facts, ya logic is lousy.
    aneed123 wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    i aint ask who u rather b i asked who is the better player

    OK forget about Robert Horry and Charles Barkley.

    Who would you rather be, Doug Williams or Dan Marino?

    dan marino fool lol

    5 Grand's response: "Sooo you're saying you'd rather be a white man as opposed to a black man?.....think about what you're saying"
  • 5 Grand
    5 Grand Members Posts: 12,869 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Let's try this one last time;


    Doug Williams
    Williams_Doug_podium.jpg


    Dan Marino
    3ZGUY45Q.jpg


    Look at the two pictures and tell me the difference.

    Seriously, who would you rather be?

    Who's better?

  • infamous114
    infamous114 Members, Moderators Posts: 52,202 Regulator
    edited October 2017
    Options
    Dan Marino is better, ?
  • 5 Grand
    5 Grand Members Posts: 12,869 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Dan Marino is better, ?

    0xyal697xjia.gif
  • DaBull
    DaBull Members Posts: 9,261 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Mcnair should be number 2
  • goodlookinout
    goodlookinout Members Posts: 5,302 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2017
    Options
    1. McNair- if I need to win a game he's my guy.

    2. Moon- One of the best pure passers ever

    3. Cunningham- Dynamic runner and passer

    4. McNabb- He was Hell in his Philly days 4sho

    5. Vick- Game breaker can blow up your scheme if he breaks out the pocket. erratic thrower but if both were on good luck.

    6. Cam Newton- Based on what we've seen so far still can get better and more lethal.

    Honorable Mention
    Jeff Blake
    Aaron Brooks
    Jameis Winston
    Vince Evans
    Kordell Stewart
    Vince Evans
    Doug Williams
    Joe Gilliam
  • Maywood
    Maywood Members Posts: 2,035 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    No McNabb ? lol
  • Moore7s
    Moore7s Members Posts: 452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Shout-out to Seneca Wallace
  • aneed123
    aneed123 Members Posts: 23,763 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    byron leftwich and Garrard
  • buttuh_b
    buttuh_b Members Posts: 13,544 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Deshaun Watson
  • buttuh_b
    buttuh_b Members Posts: 13,544 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Moore7s wrote: »
    Shout-out to Seneca Wallace

    What about Tavaris Jackson?? Haaaa
  • goodlookinout
    goodlookinout Members Posts: 5,302 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Maywood wrote: »
    No McNabb ? lol

    i smooth 4got him brain ? my bad
  • Inglewood_B
    Inglewood_B Members Posts: 12,246 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    buttuh_b wrote: »
    Deshaun Watson

    If he follow up next season with another solid outing I'm definitely putting him on my list. He's looked legit this year
  • Rampage12
    Rampage12 Members Posts: 3,512 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    Moore7s wrote: »
    "@5 Grand" u buggin

    Football is a team sport and is very situational. If I'm starting a franchise I 100% take Marino over Williams.
    grYmes wrote: »
    Winning the Super Bowl doesn’t historically make you a great QB. Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson and so many others have won but more because of the team around them. They didn’t have the stats, clutch performances or longevity to be considered greats individually.

    All time greats like Marino, Dan Fouts & Warren Moon are light years ahead of Williams and others. They just didn’t have the D or didn’t have the breaks to win it all.

    Taking Doug Williams overall just because he won a Super Bowl over Marino puts your football common sense on notice.

    There's another element of football that you guys didn't address. Namely; performance under pressure.

    In Superbowl XXII Williams passed for a Super Bowl record 340 yards and four touchdowns, with one interception.


    In Super Bowl XIX, Marino passed for 318 yards, one touchdown pass and two interceptions.


    So who's better?

    Who would you pick to start in a Superbowl?

    Clutch performing & “playing under pressure” is the same damn thing.

    Williams played against a average defense and played along with Timmy Smith. Who broke the Super Bowl rushing record & has just as much argument as being the MVP in that game. Without Elway the Broncos in the 80s would of been trash.

    Marino played against a highly underrated 49ers D & the best team in the 80s.

    Come on bruh. Plus Marino has had clutch performances before. His surrounding cast just wasn’t enough to get a ring.

    Just stop.

    Think about what your saying.

    The most important thing in football is winning the Superbowl. Thats indisputable. In fact, I'd go as far as to say that a QB's regular season statistics are irrelevant. The only thing that matters is who won the Superbowl.

    So basically Brad Johnson and Trent Dilfer are better than Marino in your opinion also.
  • Rampage12
    Rampage12 Members Posts: 3,512 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2017
    Options
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    No ones wants to be Charles Barkley, but your logic still dumb as hell when it comes to these NFL QBs.

    Explain why you'd rather be Robert Horry than Charles Barkley!
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    No ones wants to be Charles Barkley, but your logic still dumb as hell when it comes to these NFL QBs.

    Explain why you'd rather be Robert Horry than Charles Barkley!

    Barkley could have 10 titles and no one would still wanna he that ? . Why you yellin, lol.

    Face facts, ya logic is lousy.
    aneed123 wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    i aint ask who u rather b i asked who is the better player

    OK forget about Robert Horry and Charles Barkley.

    Who would you rather be, Doug Williams or Dan Marino?

    Well...Dan Marino has more money, a bust in Canton, and is considered to be one of the 10 best QB's of all-time by everyone but you...so Dan Marino. Williams also had a losing record as a starting QB and only threw 7 more TD's than INT's in his career, Marino sustained his greatness for 15 years or so. If your old ass can't understand that then I don't know what to tell you.
  • infamous114
    infamous114 Members, Moderators Posts: 52,202 Regulator
    Options
    Rampage12 wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    No ones wants to be Charles Barkley, but your logic still dumb as hell when it comes to these NFL QBs.

    Explain why you'd rather be Robert Horry than Charles Barkley!
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    No ones wants to be Charles Barkley, but your logic still dumb as hell when it comes to these NFL QBs.

    Explain why you'd rather be Robert Horry than Charles Barkley!

    Barkley could have 10 titles and no one would still wanna he that ? . Why you yellin, lol.

    Face facts, ya logic is lousy.
    aneed123 wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    i aint ask who u rather b i asked who is the better player

    OK forget about Robert Horry and Charles Barkley.

    Who would you rather be, Doug Williams or Dan Marino?

    Well...Dan Marino has more money, a bust in Canton, and is considered to be one of the 10 best QB's of all-time by everyone but you...so Dan Marino. Williams also had a losing record as a starting QB and only threw 7 more TD's than INT's in his career, Marino sustained his greatness for 15 years or so. If your old ass can't understand that then I don't know what to tell you.

    Those pimps in his neighborhood have his brains scrambled
  • 5 Grand
    5 Grand Members Posts: 12,869 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Rampage12 wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    No ones wants to be Charles Barkley, but your logic still dumb as hell when it comes to these NFL QBs.

    Explain why you'd rather be Robert Horry than Charles Barkley!
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    No ones wants to be Charles Barkley, but your logic still dumb as hell when it comes to these NFL QBs.

    Explain why you'd rather be Robert Horry than Charles Barkley!

    Barkley could have 10 titles and no one would still wanna he that ? . Why you yellin, lol.

    Face facts, ya logic is lousy.
    aneed123 wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    i aint ask who u rather b i asked who is the better player

    OK forget about Robert Horry and Charles Barkley.

    Who would you rather be, Doug Williams or Dan Marino?

    Well...Dan Marino has more money, a bust in Canton, and is considered to be one of the 10 best QB's of all-time by everyone but you...so Dan Marino. Williams also had a losing record as a starting QB and only threw 7 more TD's than INT's in his career, Marino sustained his greatness for 15 years or so. If your old ass can't understand that then I don't know what to tell you.
    Rampage12 wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    No ones wants to be Charles Barkley, but your logic still dumb as hell when it comes to these NFL QBs.

    Explain why you'd rather be Robert Horry than Charles Barkley!
    5 Grand wrote: »
    grYmes wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    No ones wants to be Charles Barkley, but your logic still dumb as hell when it comes to these NFL QBs.

    Explain why you'd rather be Robert Horry than Charles Barkley!

    Barkley could have 10 titles and no one would still wanna he that ? . Why you yellin, lol.

    Face facts, ya logic is lousy.
    aneed123 wrote: »
    5 Grand wrote: »
    aneed123 wrote: »
    is horry a better player than barkley? hell no but he got rings. rings dont validate who better all the time.

    I'd rather be Horry.

    Tell the truth, who would you rather be, Robert Horry or Charles Barkley?

    i aint ask who u rather b i asked who is the better player

    OK forget about Robert Horry and Charles Barkley.

    Who would you rather be, Doug Williams or Dan Marino?

    Well...Dan Marino has more money, a bust in Canton, and is considered to be one of the 10 best QB's of all-time by everyone but you...so Dan Marino. Williams also had a losing record as a starting QB and only threw 7 more TD's than INT's in his career, Marino sustained his greatness for 15 years or so. If your old ass can't understand that then I don't know what to tell you.

    Those pimps in his neighborhood have his brains scrambled

    Winning the Superbowl >>>
  • its....JOHN B
    its....JOHN B Members Posts: 19,830 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Michael Bishop
  • natural born sinners
    natural born sinners Members Posts: 5,335 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Ibex wrote: »
    1. Doug Williams
    2. Michael Vick
    3. Donovan McNabb
    4. Randall Cunningham
    5. Steve McNair
    6. Warren Moon
    7. Cam Newton
    8. Robert Griffin III
    9. Daunte Culpepper
    10. Charlie Ward

    Aye man...get RG3 one good season up outta here. Kappa had a better run then RG3. Also I would put Cam wayyy higher than Vick. Vick was my favorite player while w the falcons and took my NFL fandom to another level. But far as overall QB skills he was more flash than actual skill. Don't get me started on his accuracy, he was easy to neutralize once teams figured out he couldn't beat u from the pocket consistently