Good Morning. I hope all is good in your reality cuz for others....its slavery in libya
Options
Comments
-
what do you need, sirYoung_Chitlin wrote: »Busta Carmichael wrote: »Mufuckas avoiding this thread smh -
About 100 years ago Marcus Garvey told black Africans what we need to do to make ourselves respectable and strong in this world but WE did not listen and we still won't heed his words or the words of the right people who came him........ SO today Africa and Africans continues to suffer. when ? smarten the ? up thing will change until then it is what it is.
and the African is the laughingstock of humanity we are totally ? pathetic...... SOON ? will be begging the French white man for help. Even after he disrespected them
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGvvzrmQOLM
The last time I checked black Africa has a population of hundreds of millions that is divided into multiple nations and they all HAVE of some kind of military so they should have bumrushed Libya since last week Monday. -
This ? is tragic man. I hate reading stories like this and feeling helpless to prevent it or stop it
-
Libya is the new Somalia.
-
that ? been going on
America late -
-
-
This is really a thing huh? In 2017? And we got this imbecile of a president in place that won't do ? about it.. SMH ? Help us All..
-
EmM HoLLa. wrote: »This is really a thing huh? In 2017? And we got this imbecile of a president in place that won't do ? about it.. SMH ? Help us All..
Is it really his responsibility to do anything about it?? America may have bombed Libya but it didn't make Libyans enslave anybody. -
EmM HoLLa. wrote: »This is really a thing huh? In 2017? And we got this imbecile of a president in place that won't do ? about it.. SMH ? Help us All..
Africans on France are fighting to have this investigated. -
EmM HoLLa. wrote: »This is really a thing huh? In 2017? And we got this imbecile of a president in place that won't do ? about it.. SMH ? Help us All..
Is it really his responsibility to do anything about it?? America may have bombed Libya but it didn't make Libyans enslave anybody.
Wasn't his responsibility to worry about the kids in Syria either. Didn't stop him from his multi-million dollar air strike tho.
Ain't his responsibility to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel either. -
EmM HoLLa. wrote: »This is really a thing huh? In 2017? And we got this imbecile of a president in place that won't do ? about it.. SMH ? Help us All..
Is it really his responsibility to do anything about it?? America may have bombed Libya but it didn't make Libyans enslave anybody.
Wasn't his responsibility to worry about the kids in Syria either. Didn't stop him from his multi-million dollar air strike tho.
Ain't his responsibility to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel either.
Israel is an American ally and we are actively in a proxy war in Syria..... so obviously we would support Israel and bomb Syria whenever we think that's necessary plus anyway you look at it America isn't making Libyans enslave blacks. -
EmM HoLLa. wrote: »This is really a thing huh? In 2017? And we got this imbecile of a president in place that won't do ? about it.. SMH ? Help us All..
Is it really his responsibility to do anything about it?? America may have bombed Libya but it didn't make Libyans enslave anybody.
Wasn't his responsibility to worry about the kids in Syria either. Didn't stop him from his multi-million dollar air strike tho.
Ain't his responsibility to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel either.
Israel is an American ally and we are actively in a proxy war in Syria..... so obviously we would support Israel and bomb Syria whenever we think that's necessary plus anyway you look at it America isn't making Libyans enslave blacks.
Excuses.
Maybe you should actually read the US' state department website and see what they claim their policy to be:
https://www.state.gov/j/drl/hr/Human Rights
The protection of fundamental human rights was a foundation stone in the establishment of the United States over 200 years ago. Since then, a central goal of U.S. foreign policy has been the promotion of respect for human rights, as embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The United States understands that the existence of human rights helps secure the peace, deter aggression, promote the rule of law, combat crime and corruption, strengthen democracies, and prevent humanitarian crises.
Because the promotion of human rights is an important national interest, the United States seeks to:- Hold governments accountable to their obligations under universal human rights norms and international human rights instruments;
- Promote greater respect for human rights, including freedom from torture, freedom of expression, press freedom, women's rights, children's rights, and the protection of minorities;
- Promote the rule of law, seek accountability, and change cultures of impunity;
- Assist efforts to reform and strengthen the institutional capacity of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Commission on Human Rights; and
- Coordinate human rights activities with important allies, including the EU, and regional organizations.
-
EmM HoLLa. wrote: »This is really a thing huh? In 2017? And we got this imbecile of a president in place that won't do ? about it.. SMH ? Help us All..
Is it really his responsibility to do anything about it?? America may have bombed Libya but it didn't make Libyans enslave anybody.
Wasn't his responsibility to worry about the kids in Syria either. Didn't stop him from his multi-million dollar air strike tho.
Ain't his responsibility to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel either.
Israel is an American ally and we are actively in a proxy war in Syria..... so obviously we would support Israel and bomb Syria whenever we think that's necessary plus anyway you look at it America isn't making Libyans enslave blacks.
Excuses.
Maybe you should actually read the US' state department website and see what they claim their policy to be:
https://www.state.gov/j/drl/hr/Human Rights
The protection of fundamental human rights was a foundation stone in the establishment of the United States over 200 years ago. Since then, a central goal of U.S. foreign policy has been the promotion of respect for human rights, as embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The United States understands that the existence of human rights helps secure the peace, deter aggression, promote the rule of law, combat crime and corruption, strengthen democracies, and prevent humanitarian crises.
Because the promotion of human rights is an important national interest, the United States seeks to:
[*] Promote greater respect for human rights, including freedom from torture, freedom of expression, press freedom, women's rights, children's rights, and the protection of minorities;
[*] Promote the rule of law, seek accountability, and change cultures of impunity;
[*] Assist efforts to reform and strengthen the institutional capacity of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Commission on Human Rights; and
[*] Coordinate human rights activities with important allies, including the EU, and regional organizations.
? that ? it's just words to placate the weak and anyway nowhere does the bold say that america is obligating itself to SOLVE humanitarian problems when doing so would go against it's own interest. America only obligates itself to do those things when it's in American interest. America like all strong nations operates on real politik........... you have made no case for why America should be responsible for the slavery of black Africans by Libyans.
Supporting Israel has been deemed good for American interest and America would prefer to remove the leaders of Syria. -
There is no govt in Syria
-
look people have to make their minds up do you want America to be the worlds police force or not?? because on one hand people are trying to make it seem as if America is responsible for the slavery over there and should go over and stop it............. while on the other hand when america does get involved it gets called imperialist warmongers.
-
-
look people have to make their minds up do you want America to be the worlds police force or not?? because on one hand people are trying to make it seem as if America is responsible for the slavery over there and should go over and stop it............. while on the other hand when america does get involved it gets called imperialist warmongers.
When America "gets involved" and colonizes (enslaves) or topples a country for their resources, or other shady interests, or are inconsistent about it, then hell yes - they're warmongers. It's not that hard to understand.EmM HoLLa. wrote: »This is really a thing huh? In 2017? And we got this imbecile of a president in place that won't do ? about it.. SMH ? Help us All..
Is it really his responsibility to do anything about it?? America may have bombed Libya but it didn't make Libyans enslave anybody.
Wasn't his responsibility to worry about the kids in Syria either. Didn't stop him from his multi-million dollar air strike tho.
Ain't his responsibility to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel either.
Israel is an American ally and we are actively in a proxy war in Syria..... so obviously we would support Israel and bomb Syria whenever we think that's necessary plus anyway you look at it America isn't making Libyans enslave blacks.
Excuses.
Maybe you should actually read the US' state department website and see what they claim their policy to be:
https://www.state.gov/j/drl/hr/Human Rights
The protection of fundamental human rights was a foundation stone in the establishment of the United States over 200 years ago. Since then, a central goal of U.S. foreign policy has been the promotion of respect for human rights, as embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The United States understands that the existence of human rights helps secure the peace, deter aggression, promote the rule of law, combat crime and corruption, strengthen democracies, and prevent humanitarian crises.
Because the promotion of human rights is an important national interest, the United States seeks to:
[*] Promote greater respect for human rights, including freedom from torture, freedom of expression, press freedom, women's rights, children's rights, and the protection of minorities;
[*] Promote the rule of law, seek accountability, and change cultures of impunity;
[*] Assist efforts to reform and strengthen the institutional capacity of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Commission on Human Rights; and
[*] Coordinate human rights activities with important allies, including the EU, and regional organizations.
? that ? it's just words to placate the weak and anyway nowhere does the bold say that america is obligating itself to SOLVE humanitarian problems when doing so would go against it's own interest. America only obligates itself to do those things when it's in American interest. America like all strong nations operates on real politik........... you have made no case for why America should be responsible for the slavery of black Africans by Libyans.
Supporting Israel has been deemed good for American interest and America would prefer to remove the leaders of Syria.
I wasn't trying to make the case for America being responsible for slavery in Libya, so you could get off that straw man ? . I was pointing out that America's own stated policy should be enough for them to do something about it. -
look people have to make their minds up do you want America to be the worlds police force or not?? because on one hand people are trying to make it seem as if America is responsible for the slavery over there and should go over and stop it............. while on the other hand when america does get involved it gets called imperialist warmongers.
When America "gets involved" and colonizes (enslaves) or topples a country for their resources, or other shady interests, or are inconsistent about it, then hell yes - they're warmongers. It's not that hard to understand.EmM HoLLa. wrote: »This is really a thing huh? In 2017? And we got this imbecile of a president in place that won't do ? about it.. SMH ? Help us All..
Is it really his responsibility to do anything about it?? America may have bombed Libya but it didn't make Libyans enslave anybody.
Wasn't his responsibility to worry about the kids in Syria either. Didn't stop him from his multi-million dollar air strike tho.
Ain't his responsibility to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel either.
Israel is an American ally and we are actively in a proxy war in Syria..... so obviously we would support Israel and bomb Syria whenever we think that's necessary plus anyway you look at it America isn't making Libyans enslave blacks.
Excuses.
Maybe you should actually read the US' state department website and see what they claim their policy to be:
https://www.state.gov/j/drl/hr/Human Rights
The protection of fundamental human rights was a foundation stone in the establishment of the United States over 200 years ago. Since then, a central goal of U.S. foreign policy has been the promotion of respect for human rights, as embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The United States understands that the existence of human rights helps secure the peace, deter aggression, promote the rule of law, combat crime and corruption, strengthen democracies, and prevent humanitarian crises.
Because the promotion of human rights is an important national interest, the United States seeks to:
[*] Promote greater respect for human rights, including freedom from torture, freedom of expression, press freedom, women's rights, children's rights, and the protection of minorities;
[*] Promote the rule of law, seek accountability, and change cultures of impunity;
[*] Assist efforts to reform and strengthen the institutional capacity of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Commission on Human Rights; and
[*] Coordinate human rights activities with important allies, including the EU, and regional organizations.
? that ? it's just words to placate the weak and anyway nowhere does the bold say that america is obligating itself to SOLVE humanitarian problems when doing so would go against it's own interest. America only obligates itself to do those things when it's in American interest. America like all strong nations operates on real politik........... you have made no case for why America should be responsible for the slavery of black Africans by Libyans.
Supporting Israel has been deemed good for American interest and America would prefer to remove the leaders of Syria.
I wasn't trying to make the case for America being responsible for slavery in Libya, so you could get off that straw man ? . I was pointing out that America's own stated policy should be enough for them to do something about it.
You don't understand the stated policies of this nation you ? idiot. -
look people have to make their minds up do you want America to be the worlds police force or not?? because on one hand people are trying to make it seem as if America is responsible for the slavery over there and should go over and stop it............. while on the other hand when america does get involved it gets called imperialist warmongers.
When America "gets involved" and colonizes (enslaves) or topples a country for their resources, or other shady interests, or are inconsistent about it, then hell yes - they're warmongers. It's not that hard to understand.EmM HoLLa. wrote: »This is really a thing huh? In 2017? And we got this imbecile of a president in place that won't do ? about it.. SMH ? Help us All..
Is it really his responsibility to do anything about it?? America may have bombed Libya but it didn't make Libyans enslave anybody.
Wasn't his responsibility to worry about the kids in Syria either. Didn't stop him from his multi-million dollar air strike tho.
Ain't his responsibility to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel either.
Israel is an American ally and we are actively in a proxy war in Syria..... so obviously we would support Israel and bomb Syria whenever we think that's necessary plus anyway you look at it America isn't making Libyans enslave blacks.
Excuses.
Maybe you should actually read the US' state department website and see what they claim their policy to be:
https://www.state.gov/j/drl/hr/Human Rights
The protection of fundamental human rights was a foundation stone in the establishment of the United States over 200 years ago. Since then, a central goal of U.S. foreign policy has been the promotion of respect for human rights, as embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The United States understands that the existence of human rights helps secure the peace, deter aggression, promote the rule of law, combat crime and corruption, strengthen democracies, and prevent humanitarian crises.
Because the promotion of human rights is an important national interest, the United States seeks to:
[*] Promote greater respect for human rights, including freedom from torture, freedom of expression, press freedom, women's rights, children's rights, and the protection of minorities;
[*] Promote the rule of law, seek accountability, and change cultures of impunity;
[*] Assist efforts to reform and strengthen the institutional capacity of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Commission on Human Rights; and
[*] Coordinate human rights activities with important allies, including the EU, and regional organizations.
? that ? it's just words to placate the weak and anyway nowhere does the bold say that america is obligating itself to SOLVE humanitarian problems when doing so would go against it's own interest. America only obligates itself to do those things when it's in American interest. America like all strong nations operates on real politik........... you have made no case for why America should be responsible for the slavery of black Africans by Libyans.
Supporting Israel has been deemed good for American interest and America would prefer to remove the leaders of Syria.
I wasn't trying to make the case for America being responsible for slavery in Libya, so you could get off that straw man ? . I was pointing out that America's own stated policy should be enough for them to do something about it.
You don't understand the stated policies of this nation you ? idiot.
Name-calling like a lil' ? early in the morning, because you can't get your point off intellectually, and because the facts don't agree with your American ass-kissing ?
You talked out your ass, I cited a reference. Bad enough you prove yourself to be a ? in other threads. Take your L like some semblance of a man. -
look people have to make their minds up do you want America to be the worlds police force or not?? because on one hand people are trying to make it seem as if America is responsible for the slavery over there and should go over and stop it............. while on the other hand when america does get involved it gets called imperialist warmongers.
When America "gets involved" and colonizes (enslaves) or topples a country for their resources, or other shady interests, or are inconsistent about it, then hell yes - they're warmongers. It's not that hard to understand.EmM HoLLa. wrote: »This is really a thing huh? In 2017? And we got this imbecile of a president in place that won't do ? about it.. SMH ? Help us All..
Is it really his responsibility to do anything about it?? America may have bombed Libya but it didn't make Libyans enslave anybody.
Wasn't his responsibility to worry about the kids in Syria either. Didn't stop him from his multi-million dollar air strike tho.
Ain't his responsibility to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel either.
Israel is an American ally and we are actively in a proxy war in Syria..... so obviously we would support Israel and bomb Syria whenever we think that's necessary plus anyway you look at it America isn't making Libyans enslave blacks.
Excuses.
Maybe you should actually read the US' state department website and see what they claim their policy to be:
https://www.state.gov/j/drl/hr/Human Rights
The protection of fundamental human rights was a foundation stone in the establishment of the United States over 200 years ago. Since then, a central goal of U.S. foreign policy has been the promotion of respect for human rights, as embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The United States understands that the existence of human rights helps secure the peace, deter aggression, promote the rule of law, combat crime and corruption, strengthen democracies, and prevent humanitarian crises.
Because the promotion of human rights is an important national interest, the United States seeks to:
[*] Promote greater respect for human rights, including freedom from torture, freedom of expression, press freedom, women's rights, children's rights, and the protection of minorities;
[*] Promote the rule of law, seek accountability, and change cultures of impunity;
[*] Assist efforts to reform and strengthen the institutional capacity of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Commission on Human Rights; and
[*] Coordinate human rights activities with important allies, including the EU, and regional organizations.
? that ? it's just words to placate the weak and anyway nowhere does the bold say that america is obligating itself to SOLVE humanitarian problems when doing so would go against it's own interest. America only obligates itself to do those things when it's in American interest. America like all strong nations operates on real politik........... you have made no case for why America should be responsible for the slavery of black Africans by Libyans.
Supporting Israel has been deemed good for American interest and America would prefer to remove the leaders of Syria.
I wasn't trying to make the case for America being responsible for slavery in Libya, so you could get off that straw man ? . I was pointing out that America's own stated policy should be enough for them to do something about it.
You don't understand the stated policies of this nation you ? idiot.
Name-calling like a lil' ? early in the morning, because you can't get your point off intellectually, and because the facts don't agree with your American ass-kissing ?
You talked out your ass, I cited a reference. Bad enough you prove yourself to be a ? in other threads. Take your L like some semblance of a man.
I can call you an idiot and get my point off at the same time insults and proper arguments are not mutually exclusive in fact I prefer to insult people and intellectually embarrass them at the same time. YOUR response to what I initially wrote only shows your naiveté and ignorance of the world and American foreign policy.
YOU CAN CALL ME A ? ALL YOU WANT TO BUT YOU ARE THE REAL ? you are just too ? stupid to realize it. -
early in the morning??? ? it's almost noon on the east coast and I wake up at 4 and accomplish more than most ? will all week. IF THIS is early in the morning to you then no wonder they say that Americans are lazy.
-
look people have to make their minds up do you want America to be the worlds police force or not?? because on one hand people are trying to make it seem as if America is responsible for the slavery over there and should go over and stop it............. while on the other hand when america does get involved it gets called imperialist warmongers.
When America "gets involved" and colonizes (enslaves) or topples a country for their resources, or other shady interests, or are inconsistent about it, then hell yes - they're warmongers. It's not that hard to understand.EmM HoLLa. wrote: »This is really a thing huh? In 2017? And we got this imbecile of a president in place that won't do ? about it.. SMH ? Help us All..
Is it really his responsibility to do anything about it?? America may have bombed Libya but it didn't make Libyans enslave anybody.
Wasn't his responsibility to worry about the kids in Syria either. Didn't stop him from his multi-million dollar air strike tho.
Ain't his responsibility to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel either.
Israel is an American ally and we are actively in a proxy war in Syria..... so obviously we would support Israel and bomb Syria whenever we think that's necessary plus anyway you look at it America isn't making Libyans enslave blacks.
Excuses.
Maybe you should actually read the US' state department website and see what they claim their policy to be:
https://www.state.gov/j/drl/hr/Human Rights
The protection of fundamental human rights was a foundation stone in the establishment of the United States over 200 years ago. Since then, a central goal of U.S. foreign policy has been the promotion of respect for human rights, as embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The United States understands that the existence of human rights helps secure the peace, deter aggression, promote the rule of law, combat crime and corruption, strengthen democracies, and prevent humanitarian crises.
Because the promotion of human rights is an important national interest, the United States seeks to:
[*] Promote greater respect for human rights, including freedom from torture, freedom of expression, press freedom, women's rights, children's rights, and the protection of minorities;
[*] Promote the rule of law, seek accountability, and change cultures of impunity;
[*] Assist efforts to reform and strengthen the institutional capacity of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Commission on Human Rights; and
[*] Coordinate human rights activities with important allies, including the EU, and regional organizations.
? that ? it's just words to placate the weak and anyway nowhere does the bold say that america is obligating itself to SOLVE humanitarian problems when doing so would go against it's own interest. America only obligates itself to do those things when it's in American interest. America like all strong nations operates on real politik........... you have made no case for why America should be responsible for the slavery of black Africans by Libyans.
Supporting Israel has been deemed good for American interest and America would prefer to remove the leaders of Syria.
I wasn't trying to make the case for America being responsible for slavery in Libya, so you could get off that straw man ? . I was pointing out that America's own stated policy should be enough for them to do something about it.
You don't understand the stated policies of this nation you ? idiot.
Name-calling like a lil' ? early in the morning, because you can't get your point off intellectually, and because the facts don't agree with your American ass-kissing ?
You talked out your ass, I cited a reference. Bad enough you prove yourself to be a ? in other threads. Take your L like some semblance of a man.
I can call you an idiot and get my point off at the same time insults and proper arguments are not mutually exclusive in fact I prefer to insult people and intellectually embarrass them at the same time. YOUR response to what I initially wrote only shows your naiveté and ignorance of the world and American foreign policy.
YOU CAN CALL ME A ? ALL YOU WANT TO BUT YOU ARE THE REAL ? you are just too ? stupid to realize it.
Ok... ? .
Until you can dispute the fact that they're being inconsistent with their own stated policy and you have no argument against people calling that out in this thread, don't address me ? .
-
the fact of the matter is that since America is not responsible for slavery in Libya it is also not obligated to do anything about it. People in Africa especially black people have to learn to take care of themselves and people over here have to stop blaming America for every ? thing that happens overseas.
The whole middle east is a cluster ? and it's not all Americas fault. -
early in the morning??? ? it's almost noon on the east coast and I wake up at 4 and accomplish more than most ? will all week. IF THIS is early in the morning to you then no wonder they say that Americans are lazy.
It's still "morning" - ? and you still had to resort to calling names when you can't win a debate intellectually. Don't know what mountain you live on, but I've been working for 4 hours already (and probably made more than your ? ass already for the whole day) so miss me with your weak "lazy American" generalization.
MF could talk about everything but the facts ever since I posted that reference. No surprise you dance around facts, you buck-dancin ? .
