Hollywood Sex Abuse Scandal Thread - Harvey , Kevin, Andy etc
Options
Comments
-
-
stringer bell wrote: »
or just reformat and get better anti-virus software -
Angeles1son85 wrote: »
lol now they are fight against each other to see who is more pro-women.
this is why women will never win. -
-
well then he should call the FBI or the police. or have his lawyer deal w it. all this twitter ? aint coo imo -
Creepy Gene but not sexual harassment. Jesus.
-
2stepz_ahead wrote: »stringer bell wrote: »
or just reformat and get better anti-virus software2stepz_ahead wrote: »stringer bell wrote: »
or just reformat and get better anti-virus software
He just built his first PC he doesn't know any better he should of shut it down and took it to the cops -
Odds are terry crews is a christian. Dude prolly thinks that the devil is in his computer smh
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
Black_Samson wrote: »Corporations acting as their own intelligence agency have been uncovered in the past 72 hours.
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2017-12-13/hidden-world-of-private-spies
Last month, an investigation by the New Yorker magazine alleged that disgraced film producer Harvey Weinstein used private detectives from two different firms to spy on women he had allegedly sexually harassed or assaulted
Terry could very well be onto something...again.
of course they gonna try to get dirt on them but if there story is true and terrys there should be nothin to worry about -
Panthers owner Jerry Richardson selling the team after story broke about him having mutiple pay outs for sexual harassment and using racial slurs towards employees
-
Panthers owner Jerry Richardson selling the team after story broke about him having mutiple pay outs for sexual harassment and using racial slurs towards employees
I just saw that hes selling the team.. i read this ? earlier. ? "Mister" = "Master" he really was on some plantation ? ..
and like i said before what makes poweful people powerful is underlings willing to take ? and do ? .. ? ? up.. that whole bit about the NDA's.. which seem to be a pretty common occurrence in these type happenings.. -
Panthers owner Jerry Richardson selling the team after story broke about him having mutiple pay outs for sexual harassment and using racial slurs towards employees
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/21798557/carolina-panthers-owner-jerry-richardson-selling-nfl-teamThe Panthers have settled with at least four former employees regarding inappropriate workplace behavior by Richardson, according to a Sports Illustrated report.Richardson, 81, allegedly made verbal comments about women's appearances, inappropriately touched female employees and made advances to women that included asking whether he could shave their legs and for them to give him foot rubs.
-
crazy
-
? with deep pockets should jump all over this and buy that team!
-
KingLuciano wrote: »? with deep pockets should jump all over this and buy that team!
P diddy on twitter saying he will buy them
http://www.carolinahuddle.com/boards/topic/145211-diddy-wants-to-buy-the-panthers/ -
His racist ass is going to make a killing in the sell of that team.. Just like racist ass Donald Sterling did... -
The Lonious Monk wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »I have no doubt that some of these dudes did some out of line ? , but like someone said, this is basically becoming a witch hunt. At this point, dudes are being fired over allegations and nothing more. That's crazy. Any chick that has beef with a dude can accuse him of sexually harassing her, which could basically be anything and that's enough to put him in hot water.
It don't seem to be that simple in majority of these cases. Look at Matt Lauer. His firing seems quick til they came out and said they had been investigating him for months already. Alot of these networks seem to now be just doing private investigations into these claims and then going public with the info all at once. That's part of why it seems so sudden. Now the fact that all these investigations seem to be concluding at the same time is suspect and shows that they've known about these ? for a while, knew a storm was brewing, and were trying to preemptively cover their ass.
I don't know. I mean I get the feeling that everyone men and women, have known about this ? , but just accepted it. Now a few people have come out, and everyone is trying to retroactively hold people responsible for things done in the past. For egregious ? , I get that, but if there was a general culture was some things were just seen as accepted, I think it's a little ? up to go back and hold everyone accountable. I'm fine with saying certain behavior is wrong and should cease. I just don't think its right for a chick to go along with some ? for ten years like it's cool, and then suddenly come out as a victim without ever actually calling the dude out on the wrongdoing.
Like I read about this ? with Selma Hayek and Harvey Weinstein. Basically, she wanted to do a movie and he agreed to fund it. The whole time they were making the movie, he was propositioning her. He's a ? for that. However, if she never called him on it and just dealt with it, why would she have thought that he would stop. Finally, he gave her an ultimatium that either she add a naked ? sex scene of herself and someone else in the movie, or he'd pull funding. Again, he's a ? for that, but she wasn't forced to have that scene as she claims. She chose to have it. She could have walked, but she didn't. I understand she had reasons that made it hard to do so, but doing that is taking a stand and would have been worthy of praise. I'm just having a hard time applauding these chicks for coming out of the woodwork years later to pile on after its become a movement. That said if even a tenth of the ? that is being claimed is true these dudes are wildin to an unbelievable extent.
the piling on is ppl trying to change the culture
believe the thinking is, if i come forward to speak on what happened to me in 1999 and shad light on what often happens behind the scenes with these powerful exes it may give another aspiring actor or intern who is dealing with the ? today strength/inspiration to do the same
and let's not pretend like 5 or even 10 years ago these accusations were or would have been treated as they are today
there's also the believability factor.... if a young intern comes forward with accusations against a rich and powerful man/woman often times the reaction is the accuser is "just looking for a come up", "a jilted lover", "so and so would never do that". see the pattern? ... the more women come forward it only does more to bolster the accusers claims... a woman of selma's status and stature in the industry furthers helps this cause
and you don't think the accusers who come forward years or even decades later, you think it's easy for them to do so when they see that their abuser has continue to abuse and exploit others? no one is trying to excuse her from being silent
I feel you. I'm not really condemning the piling on. I understand that it's necessary to make the changes. I just don't think they are what people are making them to be. They are doing their part, but it's not the same as taking that initial step. Anyways, like I said, I'm not bashing Salma or the others, I just don't like that they characterize what happened to them as being forced because there are people who are forced to do things they don't want and that's a different matter.
These women aren't totally innocent
Ppl have to find the courage to say no...
But their actions were influenced by someone of a higher positions threatening to take something away as punishment or threatening punishment if the person does not follow instructions
What would you call that?
An ultimatum, which is still a choice. It's a ? choice, but it's still a choice.
If my boss told me to suck his ? or I'd be fired. I'd make the choice to quit and sue his ass. That wouldn't be an easy path to take since I need the income, but I absolutely am not going to do the alternative. The same was the case for all these women. For a multitude of reasons that I'm sure they felt were right, they selected the seedier option. It's ? up that they were put in that position in the first place, but they still made a choice.
Ok...not sure anyone is trying to dispute that
But are they not victims of circumstance if the choice is do this or loose out on work
And a lot the women who are coming forward did not take the "easy" route
You have the women who spoke out and were silenced and or ignored
Not sure what y'all are looking for
We have a long history to putting the onus on the accuser for change opposed to the ppl in power
Today the table are turning ...because that obviously hasn't been an effective approach...or I'd argue all that ethical
With all that's going on I can see why men would feel vilified. Unless the offense is clearly out of bounds or criminal, think the focus should be addressing how to make sure ppl don't abuse their power opposed to pointing the finger at one group. Really believe we are all susceptible to doing things we wouldn't do otherwise or acting immorally when in a position of power
Maybe you're mixing up what others are saying with what I'm saying. I believe some of these women may be full of ? or turning some things into what they aren't. But for the most part, I've already said they are victims. I just don't like them saying they were forced to do what they did because from what they say in their stories they weren't forced.
Exactly.
There's a difference between someone being forced to do something against their will............and someone who chooses to do something they really don't want to do, but did it anyway just to get ahead; and then regret doing it years later.
Slippery slope because they both feel as if they've been traumatized and violated, but the people who weren't forced shouldn't be viewed the same way as the people who were. -
Terry Crews really needs to ?
Yeah, dude should've realized how this was gonna play out before he opened his mouth.
Some things are just best left unsaid. -
The Lonious Monk wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »I have no doubt that some of these dudes did some out of line ? , but like someone said, this is basically becoming a witch hunt. At this point, dudes are being fired over allegations and nothing more. That's crazy. Any chick that has beef with a dude can accuse him of sexually harassing her, which could basically be anything and that's enough to put him in hot water.
It don't seem to be that simple in majority of these cases. Look at Matt Lauer. His firing seems quick til they came out and said they had been investigating him for months already. Alot of these networks seem to now be just doing private investigations into these claims and then going public with the info all at once. That's part of why it seems so sudden. Now the fact that all these investigations seem to be concluding at the same time is suspect and shows that they've known about these ? for a while, knew a storm was brewing, and were trying to preemptively cover their ass.
I don't know. I mean I get the feeling that everyone men and women, have known about this ? , but just accepted it. Now a few people have come out, and everyone is trying to retroactively hold people responsible for things done in the past. For egregious ? , I get that, but if there was a general culture was some things were just seen as accepted, I think it's a little ? up to go back and hold everyone accountable. I'm fine with saying certain behavior is wrong and should cease. I just don't think its right for a chick to go along with some ? for ten years like it's cool, and then suddenly come out as a victim without ever actually calling the dude out on the wrongdoing.
Like I read about this ? with Selma Hayek and Harvey Weinstein. Basically, she wanted to do a movie and he agreed to fund it. The whole time they were making the movie, he was propositioning her. He's a ? for that. However, if she never called him on it and just dealt with it, why would she have thought that he would stop. Finally, he gave her an ultimatium that either she add a naked ? sex scene of herself and someone else in the movie, or he'd pull funding. Again, he's a ? for that, but she wasn't forced to have that scene as she claims. She chose to have it. She could have walked, but she didn't. I understand she had reasons that made it hard to do so, but doing that is taking a stand and would have been worthy of praise. I'm just having a hard time applauding these chicks for coming out of the woodwork years later to pile on after its become a movement. That said if even a tenth of the ? that is being claimed is true these dudes are wildin to an unbelievable extent.
the piling on is ppl trying to change the culture
believe the thinking is, if i come forward to speak on what happened to me in 1999 and shad light on what often happens behind the scenes with these powerful exes it may give another aspiring actor or intern who is dealing with the ? today strength/inspiration to do the same
and let's not pretend like 5 or even 10 years ago these accusations were or would have been treated as they are today
there's also the believability factor.... if a young intern comes forward with accusations against a rich and powerful man/woman often times the reaction is the accuser is "just looking for a come up", "a jilted lover", "so and so would never do that". see the pattern? ... the more women come forward it only does more to bolster the accusers claims... a woman of selma's status and stature in the industry furthers helps this cause
and you don't think the accusers who come forward years or even decades later, you think it's easy for them to do so when they see that their abuser has continue to abuse and exploit others? no one is trying to excuse her from being silent
I feel you. I'm not really condemning the piling on. I understand that it's necessary to make the changes. I just don't think they are what people are making them to be. They are doing their part, but it's not the same as taking that initial step. Anyways, like I said, I'm not bashing Salma or the others, I just don't like that they characterize what happened to them as being forced because there are people who are forced to do things they don't want and that's a different matter.
These women aren't totally innocent
Ppl have to find the courage to say no...
But their actions were influenced by someone of a higher positions threatening to take something away as punishment or threatening punishment if the person does not follow instructions
What would you call that?
An ultimatum, which is still a choice. It's a ? choice, but it's still a choice.
If my boss told me to suck his ? or I'd be fired. I'd make the choice to quit and sue his ass. That wouldn't be an easy path to take since I need the income, but I absolutely am not going to do the alternative. The same was the case for all these women. For a multitude of reasons that I'm sure they felt were right, they selected the seedier option. It's ? up that they were put in that position in the first place, but they still made a choice.
Ok...not sure anyone is trying to dispute that
But are they not victims of circumstance if the choice is do this or loose out on work
And a lot the women who are coming forward did not take the "easy" route
You have the women who spoke out and were silenced and or ignored
Not sure what y'all are looking for
We have a long history to putting the onus on the accuser for change opposed to the ppl in power
Today the table are turning ...because that obviously hasn't been an effective approach...or I'd argue all that ethical
With all that's going on I can see why men would feel vilified. Unless the offense is clearly out of bounds or criminal, think the focus should be addressing how to make sure ppl don't abuse their power opposed to pointing the finger at one group. Really believe we are all susceptible to doing things we wouldn't do otherwise or acting immorally when in a position of power
Maybe you're mixing up what others are saying with what I'm saying. I believe some of these women may be full of ? or turning some things into what they aren't. But for the most part, I've already said they are victims. I just don't like them saying they were forced to do what they did because from what they say in their stories they weren't forced.
Exactly.
There's a difference between someone being forced to do something against their will............and someone who chooses to do something they really don't want to do, but did it anyway just to get ahead; and then regret doing it years later.
Slippery slope because they both feel as if they've been traumatized and violated, but the people who weren't forced shouldn't be viewed the same way as the people who were.
? all that i dont wan a go to work every day but i do lol.. the folk who werent forced sold their soul and morality for a come up... shrugs they choice they gotta live with. but once again for women accountability for choice they make dont matter. it's always someone elses fault -
KingLuciano wrote: »? with deep pockets should jump all over this and buy that team!
Its gon be a cac -
P diddy on twitter saying he will buy them
here come the celebrities who aint got 1 billion who gonna wanna be "owener" lol he on something his eyes rolling back lmao but he lost me after win superbowl after superbowl and cam gotta be like you making kap a starter wtf lol
someone comment on panthers ig
I have 6.5 billion in Bitcoin is that enough to purchse the panthers? lmao -
damn old past haunting mf's like old tweets
Unless I am misreading this, and unless something else comes out: two decades ago Chris Matthews rudely joked about a junior staff member, which (rightly) offended her. She complained to HR, they reprimanded him, agreed to a settlement with her and she left the position and went on to a successful career elsewhere in the media, as did Matthews. No other similar instances are known. Now, two decades later, all of this is being "reported" by a radical conservative "news" organization founded by a Fox News host, in, I assume, an attempt to hurt his "competition," the media in general, and "the left. I also assume it's being done with the knowledge of MSNBC's knee-? firing of Sam Seder after another right-wing troll recently spread around an old tweet in which Seder made a sarcastic joke--an action that MSNBC was forced to reverse in embarrassment. Folks, we cannot allow an issue that is finally in the forefront and so important to our society to be politically weaponized like this. It's just disgusting.
"In 1999, this matter was thoroughly reviewed and dealt with. At that time, Matthews received a formal reprimand," an MSNBC spokesperson told NBC News.
Matthews was accused of making inappropriate jokes and comments about the female staffer in front of others, NBC News reported.
The Daily Caller reported the payment was $40,000, but the MSNBC spokesperson would not confirm the amount to NBC News, citing a confidentiality agreement.
The news comes just weeks after NBC News fired Today host Matt Lauer after he was accused of sexual assault and harassment.
Matthews did not return a request for comment, according to NBC News -
Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »2stepz_ahead wrote: »stringer bell wrote: »
or just reformat and get better anti-virus software2stepz_ahead wrote: »stringer bell wrote: »
or just reformat and get better anti-virus software
He just built his first PC he doesn't know any better he should of shut it down and took it to the cops
if he built his first PC then he had to install software after formatting the new drive he placed in it.
i am sure he used computers before he built his first new one.
but i digress..
i felt good when i made chick and dumplings with cinnabons and ? claimed they didnt see the dumplings and the cinnabons was from the market. -
I ? with Terry Crews. I hope he sues them ? crackers for everything.