Is the Old Testament ? Really ? ?

Options
beenwize
beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
edited July 2012 in R & R (Religion and Race)

Is the Old Testament ? the same ? Jesus described in the New Testament?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VF9wyKFMoWY&feature=plcp
«134

Comments

  • waterproof
    waterproof Members Posts: 9,412 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 2012
    Options
    ARE YOU SERIOUS @BEENWIZE, you making another thread of the same ? .......you made the same thread as your other Yahew thread, why didnt you just up your old one and continue the thread.

    @JANKLOW CLOSE THIS THREAD OR MOVE IT TO HIS was Jesus refering to somebody else or whatever the ? that thread is called, The one where Brother Bambu and Judahxulu and I blew out of the water.
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    lol look who ran in here to defend his religion dogma
  • VIBE
    VIBE Members Posts: 54,384 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    VIBE wrote: »
    No.

    thanks for your opinion.
  • VIBE
    VIBE Members Posts: 54,384 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Throughout the bible ? is different.
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    VIBE wrote: »
    Throughout the bible ? is different.

    right and when one closely examines the scriptures you see a different ? in the Old testament than the one revealed in the New Testament. And even in the Old Testament one verse has ? wanting animal sacrifices then the other says he does not delight in animal sacrifices. There are no original hebrew scriptures that I have seen and most scriptures where ? is speaking have been translated to Lord ? or some other variation. for all I know there could be multiple entities in that book but those who edited the book translated scriptures where they speak to say Lord ? or etc to have ppl think that there is only one entity speaking in the Bible.

  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    edited July 2012
    Options
    case in point. in my opinion any entity that wants blood sacrifices is not the true ? .. i think this scripture in isaiah came from probably the true ? . but when you read other scriptures in the old testament another entity had ppl doing sacrifices for sins yet the entity in this verse asks the ppl who told them to do those sacrifices. and that scripture in hebrews i think is another insert by the enity that wants blood sacrifices.


    Isaiah 1:11
    To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats.

    When ye come to appear before me, who hath required this at your hand, to tread my courts?

    Stop bringing meaningless offerings! Your incense is detestable to me. New Moons, Sabbaths and convocations--I cannot bear your evil assemblies.

    Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth: they are a trouble unto me; I am weary to bear them.

    And when you spread forth your hands, I will hide my eyes from you: yea, when you make many prayers, I will not hear: your hands are full of blood.




    Hebrews 9:22
    Indeed, under the law almost everything is purified with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins


  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options

    2 Corinthians 3:6-20

    King James Version (KJV)


    6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.

    7 But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away:

    8 How shall not the ministration of the spirit be rather glorious?

    9 For if the ministration of condemnation be glory, much more doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory.

    10 For even that which was made glorious had no glory in this respect, by reason of the glory that excelleth.

    11 For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious.

    12 Seeing then that we have such hope, we use great plainness of speech:

    13 And not as Moses, which put a veil over his face, that the children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is abolished:





    14 But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ.

    15 But even unto this day, when Moses is read, the vail is upon their heart.

    16 Nevertheless when it shall turn to the Lord, the vail shall be taken away.

    17 Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.

    18 But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord.
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    edited July 2012
    Options
    If one looks at all the evils of this world with all the warmongering, poverty, racism, and many other ills one just needs to read their old testament or Bible.
  • bambu
    bambu Members Posts: 3,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 2012
    Options
    LOL.....

    look at this ? ? .....

    Ole' is ? really ? ??? head ass ? .....

    38690014_dealwithit_gif.gif
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    One thing that trips me out about the Old Testament is how the land of Cannan was given to a certain people but then it was suppose to be given to the Israelites later on way after the fact. And in order for the Israelites to take this land they are commanded to ? everybody including animals that live in that land. Thats a disturbing story and I don't see how that could have been commanded by the same ? that Christ revealed in the New Testament.
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    Gnostics, Yahweh, and Cosmic Mid East War

    (Part I)

    Having read widely among Gnostic texts in translation and modern New Age sources, I've come across an interesting linkage that may shed light on a few esoteric dynamics of Earth life. For specialists, it may also clarify some the origins of the Gnostic view and the debacle of the Middle East in human history. According to a rational approach to the academic study of the development of religion, the early Near Eastern Gnostic conception of an evil world-creating "Demiurge" (identified with the Old Testament Yahweh or Jehovah), is generally understood as merely an imaginative invention to help support the growth of their religion. Scholars imagine this strange reformulation of the Hebraic ? to simply indicate the Gnostics' rejection of local Jewish authority.

    According to this approach, whatever degree of metaphysical truth the Gnostic views might have (as a potentially accurate assessment of real cosmo-dynamics affecting Earth in real time and space), is also totally ignored. Indeed, such possibilities are not even considered by the conventional Gnostic scholars. It may be a result of their commitment to the symbolic approach to religious systems (holding a view that religious content is merely figurative), or perhaps some kind of innate recognition by these "experts" that cosmic matters are rightly beyond their ken. Yet, when the scope of our inquiry into spiritual literature is expanded to include select modern New Age sources (equally abstruse and arcane), some provocative correlations with the Gnostic cosmos can be made.

    In this essay we will take a close look at the complex set of issues surrounding the Gnostic view of Yahweh, the Old Testament ? of the Jews and so-called creator of the world. To this academic recounting -- using several Nag Hammadi (Egyptian source) texts, scholar Hans Jonas' classic The Gnostic Religion, and the more freewheeling Lacarriere's The Gnostics -- I will also add information from The Ra Material, a set of channeled sessions published in 1981 that also speak at length about Yahweh. Ra also explains Yahweh"s hidden relations with humanity in terms quite close to the Gnostics", and puts them in a multi-dimensional context related to what they call, the "negatively-oriented Orion Empire." In no uncertain terms, we are talking here about War in Heaven (as above, so below").

    The cosmic perspective so essential to the Gnostic message and praxis finds great response in modern times -- both from renewed popular and scholarly interest in their work, as well as from some equally subjective "received information." This meeting of old and new is valuably combustible, and has strengthened (at least for me) the validity of each of the sources involved. Much can be gained from systematic comparative analysis, and at this time in human history with vast Mid East warfare looming, it is also highly relevant to personal life.

    The basic Gnostic position is well explained by Hans Jonas and forms the basis of this discussion. Almost all Gnostic sects believe that the creator of the human world is not the true transcendental Deity (which they call the "Unknown [or] Alien ? "), but is instead a false ruler, as our world is really the product of lesser forces. Thus, one text states:

    "The world is the work of lowly powers... [and] the universe, the domain of the Archons is like a vast prison whose innermost dungeon is the earth." (Jonas, p.42-3)

    The seven concentric spheres around our Earth are "the seats of the Archons who collectively rule over the world [as] warders of the cosmic prison" (ibid, p.43). More than a few Wanderers and other sensitive souls have had the same idea, in just the same terms as depicted here and in the film, Matrix. That film, by the way, is an extremely Gnostic presentation.

    Names for these lesser powers reflect different old Testament synonyms for Yahweh, who is considered the Demiurgic leader of the seven planes variously named in different Gnostic systems (many of which show some degree of interchangeability). The anti-Judaic aspect of their teachings is nevertheless clear, as we find echoed in a statement from Simon Magus (a main Gnostic leader of the day). He stated that,

    The Demiurge was originally sent out by the good ? to create the world but [he then] established himself here as an independent deity, that is, he gave himself out to be the Most High and [now] holds captive in his creation the souls which [in truth, instead] belong to the supreme ? ." (p.109-10)

    Thus we have an inferior creator proclaiming himself falsely, binding the souls of his inmates through deception and an elaborate multi-leveled surveillance system (sound familiar?). The motivation for maintaining such a complex system to entrap humanity is the very inferiority of the warders themselves, who actually recognize somewhat the weakness of their position.

    Speaking of the specific evil of these Archons, Jonas clarifies that:

    "their badness is not that of the archenemy or the eternal hater of the Light [ie, Lucifer], but that of ignorant usurpers who, unaware of their sub-altern rank in the hierarchy of being, arrogate lordship to themselves, and in the combination of feeble means with envy and ? for power can achieve only a caricature of true divinity." (p.133)

    These lesser powers cling to whatever material power they can, since deep down they realize there are higher beings above them, even allowing their treachery. Such is a common understanding in other, more modern presentations of the place of "evil" in the cosmic scheme.

    And so we return to a traditional characterization of the jealous, wrathful Yahweh -- who according to Marcion (another Gnostic teacher) is so different from the Father spoken of by Jesus that he must be a false ? . Marcion (the fellow who actually coined the terms "Old" and "New" Testament) was very serious about establishing clearly for all to see the nature of this radical demarcation (Lacarriere, p.100). He thus comes to the same basic Gnostic conclusion via a more Christian angle: Jesus' Father is the Unknown ? , but He is quite different from the vengeful ? of the Hebrews.

    We are shown here a metaphysically based denunciation of the Old Testament, and the movement of small, fringe sects towards an esoteric reformulation of Christianity. This is also shown in such Gnostic tractates as The Gospel of Thomas that speak of Jesus Christ as a Gnostic adept -- which also served as the basis of their radical sectarian practices, all meant to outwit these very same Archons. To these teachers, the whole of the Old Testament was suspect, and most Gnostics saw it as an elaborate scheme reasserting Aeonic dominion over ignorant Earth humanity. Some people see fundamentalist orthodoxy of all stripes today in just the same light.

    Jonas notes, "one recurring feature [of Gnosticism] is the assertion that the [Old Testament] prophecies and the Mosaic Law issued from these [deceptive] world-ruling angels, among whom the Jewish ? is prominent" (p.133). Obviously, these sects were quite antagonistic towards the Hebraic hierarchy of their day. Indeed, Saturninus (yet another Gnostic sect leader) taught that the Old Testament prophecies originated from both Satan and the Archons. To the Gnostic teachers, the entire Judaic dispensation was merely a clever ploy of the arrogant world-creator and his clone-consorts.

    In this view, what is promoted as, and thus is presented to willfully naïve humanity to be genuine religious teaching (serving the development of the Judaic system) is really that which maintains our ignorance and servitude. Accordingly, the Gnostic's task is to pierce the veils of the evil spheres and throw off the shackles of conventional (at that time, Hebraic) morality -- and proclaim for all to hear the falseness of the supposedly righteous orthodoxy.

  • bambu
    bambu Members Posts: 3,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 2012
    Options
    LOL.....

    Here we go again....

    The demiurge is a concept from the Platonic, Neopythagorean, Middle Platonic, and Neoplatonic schools of philosophy for an artisan-like figure responsible for the fashioning and maintenance of the physical universe. The term was subsequently adopted by the Gnostics. Although a fashioner, the demiurge is not necessarily thought of as being the same as the creator figure in the familiar monotheistic sense, because both the demiurge itself plus the material from which the demiurge fashions the universe are considered either uncreated and eternal, or the product of some other being, depending on the system.

    38690014_dealwithit_gif.gif
  • VIBE
    VIBE Members Posts: 54,384 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    The ? in the bible is multiple gods.
  • waterproof
    waterproof Members Posts: 9,412 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    bambu wrote: »
    LOL.....

    Here we go again....

    The demiurge is a concept from the Platonic, Neopythagorean, Middle Platonic, and Neoplatonic schools of philosophy for an artisan-like figure responsible for the fashioning and maintenance of the physical universe. The term was subsequently adopted by the Gnostics. Although a fashioner, the demiurge is not necessarily thought of as being the same as the creator figure in the familiar monotheistic sense, because both the demiurge itself plus the material from which the demiurge fashions the universe are considered either uncreated and eternal, or the product of some other being, depending on the system.

    38690014_dealwithit_gif.gif

    WHY IS THIS THREAD STILL OPEN, @bambu again you debunk this nonsense i mean a coward dies a thousand deaths and this topic been killed a thousand times by the like of Bambu, Judahxulu and bambu.
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    Lol look at waterpuddle.. this thread still here cuz it never been killed and u caught feelings now gtfoh. And ? claims to be black yet does not identify himself with the Hebrew faith. He is jus a lame looking to be apart of a group.
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    ? if u are black and a descendant of the slave trade why u don't identify with the Hebrew faith? U reject that and claim Egypt but too much of a ? to state your beliefs lol
  • bambu
    bambu Members Posts: 3,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Why are you concerned with my "identification" ? .....

    I think it is clear that I identify more with my Hebrew brothers than any of you atheists or feeble-minded squareheads.......
  • waterproof
    waterproof Members Posts: 9,412 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    beenwize wrote: »
    ? if u are black and a descendant of the slave trade why u don't identify with the Hebrew faith? U reject that and claim Egypt but too much of a ? to state your beliefs lol

    you @bambu it's funny how beenfool try to claim the Egyptian heritage but he's on record on saying that the Aliens built the pyramids and the all the holy books were written by aliens..lol

  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    I'm not an atheist and I don't identity with them ? .. and u not fooling me u Neanderthal descendant, u on the forum running a game.. claiming u identity with Hebrew but yet u don't believe their scripture. And according to their scripure u either fully with it or u not. U clearly attempt to identify with Egypt and their gods so u can't stop bullshytin around boy.
  • bambu
    bambu Members Posts: 3,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    No doubt @waterproof...

    This ? is pathetic.....

    Judah and I were holding our own in an evolution debate and this ? cant stand it.....

    LOL....He even picked up a few cheerleaders to cosign his nonsense....
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    So what's the deal ? ? Are u a worshipper of Yahweh or Ancient Egyptian gods? U ain't fooling me running your lil games. U a wanna be Egyptologist and still say u identity with Hebrews but their scripture shyts on Egypt and its ppl yet u claim egyptians to be your ancestors. U jus too much of a ? to stand your ground and state what u believe cuz u a weak coward. Now u talking about u identify more with your Hebrew brothers.. well how so?
  • waterproof
    waterproof Members Posts: 9,412 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    beenwize wrote: »
    So what's the deal ? ? Are u a worshipper of Yahweh or Ancient Egyptian gods? U ain't fooling me running your lil games. U a wanna be Egyptologist and still say u identity with Hebrews but their scripture shyts on Egypt and its ppl yet u claim egyptians to be your ancestors. U jus too much of a ? to stand your ground and state what u believe cuz u a weak coward. Now u talking about u identify more with your Hebrew brothers.. well how so?

    you is wicked the egyptians are our brothers in spirit and blood, all you is doing is causing division and confusion and i rebuke you and the scriptures call you a liar.

    Isaiah 19:25 Whom YHWH of hosts shall bless, saying, Blessed be Egypt my people, and Assyria the work of my hands, and Israel mine inheritance.