3 Chicago teens ? 12 year old girl... at gunpoint... post video on facebook
Options
Comments
-
N.o.i condemns eating porkRodrigueZz wrote: »pelle pelle wrote: »? sayin ? , castrate and beat those lil ? be3 the main ones payin for ghetto gaggers, ? abuse subscriptions..
Talmbout "I'm a muslim" while eatin a ham sandwich type ?
You were on point w/ the first one
what does dietary choices have to do with moral consistency though?
-
pelle pelle wrote: »? sayin ? , castrate and beat those lil ? be3 the main ones payin for ghetto gaggers, ? abuse subscriptions..
Talmbout "I'm a muslim" while eatin a ham sandwich type ?
How the ? do you not understand the difference between grown adults consenting to do lewd sexual acts and
12 year old girl being ? by teenagera by gunpoint? Did this ? just compare this ? being posted on fb to a ghetto gaggers scene wtf. And your dead serious too
You need to call an abortion clinic bring ya moms there crawl up her cooch and let the doctor fix what they should have years ago -
Damn auto correct...mean machinetexasdaking88 wrote: »texasdaking88 wrote: »? is disgusting... and ? be talking bout them ? hard... nah, them ? ? that hide behind a gun.. theyll get sodomized in prison tho
Woooo my boy did a bid in Louisiana....(Angola) smmfh,nh@what he told me......2 of the worse things you don't wanna do before being sent to tha pen...? /sexually assault kids/? women....yea dem boys in for a ruuuuuuude awakening.
Nowadays u gotta do some ? up ? just to get n Angola due to overcrowding so u know what type of ? n there.. them young ? bout to be green machine cheerleaders
-
? , simulated ? /abuse and actual ? /abuse are no different and affects the parties involved mentally on many levels...
Whether it's two consenting adults playing out a sick fantasy or some sick individual actually ? someone, when the lights go out and it's time for bed, minds are being warped..
Foh u sensitive ass ? -
Trains get run on ? ery'day. I want to know where the ? part came in at ?
Hope this ? ain't just lyin' because those dumb ? posted it on FB. (Just saying)
Not just "she saw a gun and was scared". After all, she did go over there willingly.
Did they threaten her with the gun ? Also, not just words from the cops - like they won't say anything to support their charges.
I need more to go on before I can say hang/castrate those ? . -
Never watched a ghetto gaggers and never will..
SHOOT THEM ? still stands -
pelle pelle wrote: »? , simulated ? /abuse and actual ? /abuse are no different and affects the parties involved mentally on many levels...
Whether it's two consenting adults playing out a sick fantasy or some sick individual actually ? someone, when the lights go out and it's time for bed, minds are being warped..
Foh u sensitive ass ?
Foh u some extra dumb dik in the ? ass ? anything that's pretended isnt the same as that actual thing gtfoh she didn't know she was going to get ? she didn't know it was going to be recorded these hoes consented to both how are they compareable?
Don't tell me u got a degree In rapeology or some bs like that one of these other ? would say to convice ppl they know what there talkin about because u dumb as ? to think a pretend situation is the same as the real one foh
-
pelle pelle wrote: »? , simulated ? /abuse and actual ? /abuse are no different and affects the parties involved mentally on many levels...
Whether it's two consenting adults playing out a sick fantasy or some sick individual actually ? someone, when the lights go out and it's time for bed, minds are being warped..
Foh u sensitive ass ?
You going to have to explain this to me dog. I get the point you're trying to make, but at the same time everyone knows the porn ? is consensual and that there are no victims. Neither of those can be said about a real ? . And everyone has sick fantasies, but that is not the same as victimizing someone else.
You saying that it's wrong for someone to enjoy abuse porn but attack an instance of real ? is like saying it's wrong to play a violent video game but speak out against mass murder. That's not logical. -
? like ghetto gaggers makes folks desensitized to sexual violence.. Which means, the more a person watches ? like that, the higher chance they will try to reenact their fantasy no matter how depraved it may be..
Grown ? in here talking about killing kids for harming other kids even though those same kids are exposed to simulated violence committed by adults.. Porn, movies or whatever..
Don't condemn the effect before examining the cause..
But you know it all b.. -
My whole point was violence begets violence.. Real or simulated..The Lonious Monk wrote: »pelle pelle wrote: »? , simulated ? /abuse and actual ? /abuse are no different and affects the parties involved mentally on many levels...
Whether it's two consenting adults playing out a sick fantasy or some sick individual actually ? someone, when the lights go out and it's time for bed, minds are being warped..
Foh u sensitive ass ?
You going to have to explain this to me dog. I get the point you're trying to make, but at the same time everyone knows the porn ? is consensual and that there are no victims. Neither of those can be said about a real ? . And everyone has sick fantasies, but that is not the same as victimizing someone else.
You saying that it's wrong for someone to enjoy abuse porn but attack an instance of real ? is like saying it's wrong to play a violent video game but speak out against mass murder. That's not logical.
True a rational adult can watch some foul ? and know it's make believe but we talking about kids here.. Who knows what type of ? they've been exposed to in order for them to exhibit such brutal behavior..
I don't ? with that abusive/violent porn bcuz to me that ? is a bunch of hateful in the closet ? ? .. So for a ? to be cool with that but have a problem with actual ? seems like hypocrisy..
Simulated or real, the ? seems wrong to me..
-
these kids getting eaten alive in the pen
-
pelle pelle wrote: »
My whole point was violence begets violence.. Real or simulated..The Lonious Monk wrote: »pelle pelle wrote: »? , simulated ? /abuse and actual ? /abuse are no different and affects the parties involved mentally on many levels...
Whether it's two consenting adults playing out a sick fantasy or some sick individual actually ? someone, when the lights go out and it's time for bed, minds are being warped..
Foh u sensitive ass ?
You going to have to explain this to me dog. I get the point you're trying to make, but at the same time everyone knows the porn ? is consensual and that there are no victims. Neither of those can be said about a real ? . And everyone has sick fantasies, but that is not the same as victimizing someone else.
You saying that it's wrong for someone to enjoy abuse porn but attack an instance of real ? is like saying it's wrong to play a violent video game but speak out against mass murder. That's not logical.
True a rational adult can watch some foul ? and know it's make believe but we talking about kids here.. Who knows what type of ? they've been exposed to in order for them to exhibit such brutal behavior..
I don't ? with that abusive/violent porn bcuz to me that ? is a bunch of hateful in the closet ? ? .. So for a ? to be cool with that but have a problem with actual ? seems like hypocrisy..
Simulated or real, the ? seems wrong to me..
Ok, that makes more sense because it was really sounds like you were saying that there was no difference between the two things. It's one thing to say they are both wrong in some way, but saying simulated ? is the same as real ? is silly. -
The ? that bothers me is how easily ya'll ? are quick to condemn a bunch of kids..lol
The homie @7figz made good points tho.. -
pelle pelle wrote: »The ? that bothers me is how easily ya'll ? are quick to condemn a bunch of kids..lol
The homie @7figz made good points tho..
Why does that bother you? Kids or no kids, if they do some vicious ? , they should face consequences. If a 16 y/o brutalizes someone close to you, are you going to just dismiss it because he's a kid? -
Even if she did give her constent, why are a bunch of 16 year olds ? a 12 year old girl and then taping it?? The ? is still disgusting and all 3 need to go to jail.
-
pelle pelle wrote: »The ? that bothers me is how easily ya'll ? are quick to condemn a bunch of kids..lol
The homie @7figz made good points tho..
Word. It's a little alarming how quick ? on here are to run with just allegations. ? ain't sayin' "If it's true", asking questions, or any of that ? - just hang'em, castrate 'em, etc...
I expect that from Yahoo and CNN commenters but I ain't know the IC was so quick to trust the words of the cops, prosecutors, media, etc... considering they'd say the same ? about you - guilty or not.
Makes you wonder what would happen to ya' own black ass if they were sittin' on your jury, and you're trying to plead your innocence. -
scusy
-
What is a 12 year old, talking about with a 16 yearold?
The new Barney episode?
The ? went over their 2 suck ? .
-
i'm not sayin dismiss what they did but they need to be held accountable in a fair and just manner..The Lonious Monk wrote: »pelle pelle wrote: »The ? that bothers me is how easily ya'll ? are quick to condemn a bunch of kids..lol
The homie @7figz made good points tho..
Why does that bother you? Kids or no kids, if they do some vicious ? , they should face consequences. If a 16 y/o brutalizes someone close to you, are you going to just dismiss it because he's a kid?
? in here saying ? them shorties before they even have the opportunity to be rehabilitated..if a person gets a paper cut on their finger, you dont cut off the whole hand do you?
Same applies to those youngsters..and at the end of the day, none of us knows what really happens..I read about the story yesterday and nothing has changed since then..we all have the same amount of info yet ppl in here talking like they were eye witnesses and knew exactly what happen
-
pelle pelle wrote: »The ? that bothers me is how easily ya'll ? are quick to condemn a bunch of kids..lol
The homie @7figz made good points tho..
Word. It's a little alarming how quick ? on here are to run with just allegations. ? ain't sayin' "If it's true", asking questions, or any of that ? - just hang'em, castrate 'em, etc...
I expect that from Yahoo and CNN commenters but I ain't know the IC was so quick to trust the words of the cops, prosecutors, media, etc...
Makes you wonder what would happen to ya' own black ass if you they was sittin' on your jury, and you're pleading your innocence.
Dog, this is a internet forum, not a courtroom. Some ? should just be understood. Of course people in here aren't saying the kids should be strung up if they really didn't do anything. For the basis of conversation, it is being discussed under the assumption that what is being reported is true. I hate when people come with the well you didn't say "If true" or "sometimes" BS. Anybody with sense knows that ? should go without saying for circumstances like this. -
Even if she did give her constent, why are a bunch of 16 year olds ? a 12 year old girl and then taping it?? The ? is still disgusting and all 3 need to go to jail.
Really ?
So people should go to jail for having consensual sex because they taped it ? -
pelle pelle wrote: »
My whole point was violence begets violence.. Real or simulated..The Lonious Monk wrote: »pelle pelle wrote: »? , simulated ? /abuse and actual ? /abuse are no different and affects the parties involved mentally on many levels...
Whether it's two consenting adults playing out a sick fantasy or some sick individual actually ? someone, when the lights go out and it's time for bed, minds are being warped..
Foh u sensitive ass ?
You going to have to explain this to me dog. I get the point you're trying to make, but at the same time everyone knows the porn ? is consensual and that there are no victims. Neither of those can be said about a real ? . And everyone has sick fantasies, but that is not the same as victimizing someone else.
You saying that it's wrong for someone to enjoy abuse porn but attack an instance of real ? is like saying it's wrong to play a violent video game but speak out against mass murder. That's not logical.
True a rational adult can watch some foul ? and know it's make believe but we talking about kids here.. Who knows what type of ? they've been exposed to in order for them to exhibit such brutal behavior..
I don't ? with that abusive/violent porn bcuz to me that ? is a bunch of hateful in the closet ? ? .. So for a ? to be cool with that but have a problem with actual ? seems like hypocrisy..
Simulated or real, the ? seems wrong to me..
how did you reach this conclusion -
With a 12 year old child, yes. It's called statutory ? and filming child porn.... -
The Lonious Monk wrote: »pelle pelle wrote: »The ? that bothers me is how easily ya'll ? are quick to condemn a bunch of kids..lol
The homie @7figz made good points tho..
Word. It's a little alarming how quick ? on here are to run with just allegations. ? ain't sayin' "If it's true", asking questions, or any of that ? - just hang'em, castrate 'em, etc...
I expect that from Yahoo and CNN commenters but I ain't know the IC was so quick to trust the words of the cops, prosecutors, media, etc...
Makes you wonder what would happen to ya' own black ass if you they was sittin' on your jury, and you're pleading your innocence.
Dog, this is a internet forum, not a courtroom. Some ? should just be understood. Of course people in here aren't saying the kids should be strung up if they really didn't do anything. For the basis of conversation, it is being discussed under the assumption that what is being reported is true. I hate when people come with the well you didn't say "If true" or "sometimes" BS. Anybody with sense knows that ? should go without saying for circumstances like this.
Really ? Keep believing that ? .
I won't assume people are thinking fairly when I see ? like this -Even if she did give her constent, why are a bunch of 16 year olds ? a 12 year old girl and then taping it?? The ? is still disgusting and all 3 need to go to jail.
In other words, it doesn't even have to be ? for her to want them to go to jail.
Not the first time ? like that's been said on here by the way. The term ? is gettin' stretched real broad lately.
So if motherfuckas is just saying shoot'em, castrate'em, lock'em up, etc... and not questioning the obvious, just gonna go on ahead and believe that's what they mean.
-
With a 12 year old child, yes. It's called statutory ? and filming child porn....
So first it's "even if she did consent" and cuz they taped it, then it's because of their ages?
If an adult had sex with a 12 year old - yes. Age of consent in Illinois: 16.
And only one of them was 16, not a "bunch" of them.
