Boom, Bye, Bye, Inna Batty Bwoy Head, Along with Being Beaten, Stabbed and Run Over By a Car
Options
Comments
-
ItzGravitation wrote: »ItzGravitation wrote: »nothing like this goes on in America
Not when it comes to ?
or anyone else.
Jamaica needs a nuclear strike on it to eliminate the hate.
start fresh with nice people
So wait ..... Jamaicans went out and targeted this guy because he was ? ? Did they go searching for him?
Admit the guy was wrong and move on. No he did not deserve to die IMO, but the reality is this is not unique to Jamaica. If this happened in some rough gangster area in the USA this would have been the outcome too. The guy went looking for trouble, whether he found it funny, got a high or wanted to be some sort of hero or prankster, he went looking for trouble and he found it.
You shed a tear for this guy yet?
Maybe USA needs a nuclear strike on it to eliminate this type of hate too -
this guy advocated genocide on a small mostly black nation over the death of one ? that's now hard these ? want to force themselves on other people.
-
i'm black.
and i know this doesnt make sense, but i cant tolerate intolerant people.
i can accept people for who they are so why shouldnt everyone?
why do they have to hate ? that way?
why did someone have to lose their child?
maybe the guy who he danced with should have been more observant and less promiscuous -
ItzGravitation wrote: »i'm black.
and i know this doesnt make sense, but i cant tolerate intolerant people.
i can accept people for who they are so why shouldnt everyone?
why do they have to hate ? that way?
why did someone have to lose their child?
maybe the guy who he danced with should have been more observant and less promiscuous
The disgust of homosexuality runs deep in jamaica and there are cultural and historically reasons for this. May be this boy should not have violated the men in the dance. people were most likely drinking and high that ? took advantage of this and paid the price for his deception. If you can't tolerate intolerance you are not that tolerant. -
how can you be so ? you cant tell the difference between sexes?
dude was most likely cool with it til someone found out;.
then he turned homophobic -
ItzGravitation wrote: »how can you be so ? you cant tell the difference between sexes?
dude was most likely cool with it til someone found out;.
then he turned homophobic
? OUT OF HERE WITH THIS ? , you batty man feel everybody is secretly ? it's like you cannot understand many people just really really don't like you. The boy was dressed like a girl -
ItzGravitation wrote: »how can you be so ? you cant tell the difference between sexes?
dude was most likely cool with it til someone found out;.
then he turned homophobic
? OUT OF HERE WITH THIS ? , you batty man feel everybody is secretly ? it's like you cannot understand many people just really really don't like you. The boy was dressed like a girl
you're right.
because i fnd it hard to just hate someone like homophobic people do -
ItzGravitation wrote: »ItzGravitation wrote: »how can you be so ? you cant tell the difference between sexes?
dude was most likely cool with it til someone found out;.
then he turned homophobic
? OUT OF HERE WITH THIS ? , you batty man feel everybody is secretly ? it's like you cannot understand many people just really really don't like you. The boy was dressed like a girl
you're right.
because i fnd it hard to just hate someone like homophobic people do
People dislike ? because you push yourself on people alot of the times if you people would act normal you would have less problems. if this boy did not push himself on people he might still be alive -
ItzGravitation wrote: »ItzGravitation wrote: »nothing like this goes on in America
Not when it comes to ?
or anyone else.
Jamaica needs a nuclear strike on it to eliminate the hate.
start fresh with nice people
So wait ..... Jamaicans went out and targeted this guy because he was ? ? Did they go searching for him?
Admit the guy was wrong and move on. No he did not deserve to die IMO, but the reality is this is not unique to Jamaica. If this happened in some rough gangster area in the USA this would have been the outcome too. The guy went looking for trouble, whether he found it funny, got a high or wanted to be some sort of hero or prankster, he went looking for trouble and he found it.
You shed a tear for this guy yet?
Maybe USA needs a nuclear strike on it to eliminate this type of hate too
That wasn't a hate crime that was a couple of dumb ? with a gun. You won't here anyone defending their actions unless their trollin. -
ItzGravitation wrote: »how can you be so ? you cant tell the difference between sexes?
dude was most likely cool with it til someone found out;.
then he turned homophobic
Please ..... step out of your comfort zone for once. Things are different in the Caribbean. When a party starts at 10pm it doesn't end until 7am. People usually ? by midnight/1am and still party until whenever. We don't stand against the walls and bob our heads. We dance. Men don't necessarily target the hottest/prettiest girl to dance with, we just go in, so nobody is checking out a female from all angles before approaching. Around here, females don't stand off and wait for you to approach them or wait til you come by them a drink. They come dance with you if they see you by yourself. This is normal around here.
Why do you think it was right for the guy to do what he did? Why not stick to his own community and their parties? Why purposely go to an area where he knows its all straight people and dance with straight people?
Why you acting like this doesn't happen in your country? Why target another country for hate when you can't fix your own? -
ItzGravitation wrote: »ItzGravitation wrote: »nothing like this goes on in America
Not when it comes to ?
or anyone else.
Jamaica needs a nuclear strike on it to eliminate the hate.
start fresh with nice people
So wait ..... Jamaicans went out and targeted this guy because he was ? ? Did they go searching for him?
Admit the guy was wrong and move on. No he did not deserve to die IMO, but the reality is this is not unique to Jamaica. If this happened in some rough gangster area in the USA this would have been the outcome too. The guy went looking for trouble, whether he found it funny, got a high or wanted to be some sort of hero or prankster, he went looking for trouble and he found it.
You shed a tear for this guy yet?
Maybe USA needs a nuclear strike on it to eliminate this type of hate too
That wasn't a hate crime that was a couple of dumb ? with a gun. You won't here anyone defending their actions unless their trollin.
that makes it even worse because they killed for no reason. -
ItzGravitation wrote: »ItzGravitation wrote: »nothing like this goes on in America
Not when it comes to ?
or anyone else.
Jamaica needs a nuclear strike on it to eliminate the hate.
start fresh with nice people
So wait ..... Jamaicans went out and targeted this guy because he was ? ? Did they go searching for him?
Admit the guy was wrong and move on. No he did not deserve to die IMO, but the reality is this is not unique to Jamaica. If this happened in some rough gangster area in the USA this would have been the outcome too. The guy went looking for trouble, whether he found it funny, got a high or wanted to be some sort of hero or prankster, he went looking for trouble and he found it.
You shed a tear for this guy yet?
Maybe USA needs a nuclear strike on it to eliminate this type of hate too
That wasn't a hate crime that was a couple of dumb ? with a gun. You won't here anyone defending their actions unless their trollin.
that makes it even worse because they killed for no reason.
I agree but no one will defend them. They won't even have a good jail stay -
ItzGravitation wrote: »ItzGravitation wrote: »nothing like this goes on in America
Not when it comes to ?
or anyone else.
Jamaica needs a nuclear strike on it to eliminate the hate.
start fresh with nice people
So wait ..... Jamaicans went out and targeted this guy because he was ? ? Did they go searching for him?
Admit the guy was wrong and move on. No he did not deserve to die IMO, but the reality is this is not unique to Jamaica. If this happened in some rough gangster area in the USA this would have been the outcome too. The guy went looking for trouble, whether he found it funny, got a high or wanted to be some sort of hero or prankster, he went looking for trouble and he found it.
You shed a tear for this guy yet?
Maybe USA needs a nuclear strike on it to eliminate this type of hate too
That wasn't a hate crime that was a couple of dumb ? with a gun. You won't here anyone defending their actions unless their trollin.
Not comparing it as a hate crime. Comparing it as a senseless killing. In this case an Austrailian student was killed because three American teens had "nothing better to do" and he was the first person they saw. -
ItzGravitation wrote: »i'm black.
and i know this doesnt make sense, but i cant tolerate intolerant people.
i can accept people for who they are so why shouldnt everyone?
why do they have to hate ? that way?
why did someone have to lose their child?
maybe the guy who he danced with should have been more observant and less promiscuous
so your solution is to nuke them?
but somehow you are morally superior to others right? -
whatever you are you must be physic you must also so think the whole island of jamaica and the entire continent of africa is made up of closet cases.Maximus Rex wrote: »Did the "rude boys," go a little too hard? ?ossibly and that I can understand that argument
-
lol people need to go outside america and they will see that ? ? is not widely accepted like america makes it seem, fiya pon a battyman
-
y'all letting itzgrav troll the living ? out of you.
-
i'm just going to say it again: there's a point where the level of rage in response to homosexuality implies closet cases
Look at all the hate this post got. Lol.
You ? I swear.
Some shameful ? in this thread. And ya'll got the nerve to wonder how people could smile in lynching photographs....
-
Swiffness! wrote: »Look at all the hate this post got. Lol.
You ? I swear.
-
Maximus Rex wrote: »I can understand why they did what they did. This ? ass muthafucka was in the party trying to catch unsuspecting dudes slippin'.
This slipped past me at first. You say its justified assaulting somebody in order to protect the stupid and/or closeted ? that would try to holla at a ? ? The ? ? -
Maximus Rex wrote: »MONTEGO BAY, Jamaica (AP) http://news.yahoo.com/jamaica-transgender-teen-murdered-mob-070446416.html
— Dwayne Jones was relentlessly teased in high school for being effeminate until he dropped out. His father not only kicked him out of the house at the age of 14 but also helped jeering neighbors push the youngster from the rough Jamaican slum where he grew up.
By age 16, the teenager was dead — beaten, stabbed, shot and run over by a car when he showed up at a street party dressed as a woman. His mistake: confiding to a friend that he was attending a "straight" party as a girl for the first time in his life.
"When I saw Dwayne's body, I started shaking and crying," said Khloe, one of three transgender friends who shared a derelict house with the teenager in the hills above the north coast city of Montego Bay. Like many transgender and ? people in Jamaica, Khloe wouldn't give a full name out of fear.
"It was horrible. It was so, so painful to see him like that."
.... besides murdering their neighbors in cold blood on a daily bases because white politicians order them too..
.. whats next? a celebration commemorating the 50th year anniversary of a civil rights they don't actually have??
"During the past few years strong movements have developed among women and among homosexuals seeking their liberation. There has been some uncertainty about how to relate to these movements.
Whatever your personal opinions and your insecurities about
homosexuality and the various liberation movements among homosexuals
and women (and I speak of the homosexuals and women as oppressed
groups), we should try to unite with them in a revolutionary fashion.
I say ” whatever your insecurities are” because as we very well know,
sometimes our first instinct is to want to hit a homosexual in the
mouth, and want a woman to be quiet. We want to hit a homosexual in
the mouth because we are afraid that we might be homosexual; and we
want to hit the women or shut her up because we are afraid that she
might castrate us, or take the nuts that we might not have to start
with.
We must gain security in ourselves and therefore have respect and
feelings for all oppressed people. We must not use the racist attitude
that the White racists use against our people because they are Black
and poor. Many times the poorest White person is the most racist
because he is afraid that he might lose something, or discover
something that he does not have. So you’re some kind of a threat to
him. This kind of psychology is in operation when we view oppressed
people and we are angry with them because of their particular kind of
behavior, or their particular kind of deviation from the established
norm.
Remember, we have not established a revolutionary value system; we are
only in the process of establishing it. I do not remember our ever
constituting any value that said that a revolutionary must say
offensive things towards homosexuals, or that a revolutionary should
make sure that women do not speak out about their own particular kind
of oppression. As a matter of fact, it is just the opposite: we say
that we recognize the women’s right to be free. We have not said much
about the homosexual at all, but we must relate to the homosexual
movement because it is a real thing. And I know through reading, and
through my life experience and observations that homosexuals are not
given freedom and liberty by anyone in the society. They might be the
most oppresed people in the society.
And what made them homosexual? Perhaps it’s a phenomenon that I don’t
understand entirely. Some people say that it is the decadence of
capitalism. I don’t know if that is the case; I rather doubt it. But
whatever the case is, we know that homosexuality is a fact that
exists, and we must understand it in its purest form: that is, a
person should have the freedom to use his body in whatever way he
wants.
That is not endorsing things in homosexuality that we wouldn’t view as
revolutionary. But there is nothing to say that a homosexual cannot
also be a revolutionary. And maybe I’m now injecting some of my
prejudice by saying that “even a homosexual can be a revolutionary.”
Quite the contrary, maybe a homosexual could be the most
revolutionary.
When we have revolutionary conferences, rallies, and demonstrations,
there should be full participation of the ? liberation movement and
the women’s liberation movement. Some groups might be more
revolutionary than others. We should not use the actions of a few to
say that they are all reactionary or counterrevolutionary, because
they are not.
We should deal with the factions just as we deal with any other group
or party that claims to be revolutionary. We should try to judge,
somehow, whether they are operating in a sincere revolutionary fashion
and from a really oppressed situation. (And we will grant that if they
are women they are probably oppressed.) If they do things that are
unrevolutionary or counterrevolutionary, then criticize that action.
If we feel that the group in spirit means to be revolutionary in
practice, but they make mistakes in interpretation of the
revolutionary philosophy, or they do not understand the dialectics of
the social forces in operation, we should criticize that and not
criticize them because they are women trying to be free. And the same
is true for homosexuals. We should never say a whole movement is
dishonest when in fact they are trying to be honest. They are just
making honest mistakes. Friends are allowed to make mistakes. The
enemy is not allowed to make mistakes because his whole existence is a
mistake, and we suffer from it. But the women’s liberation front and
? liberation front are our friends, they are our potential allies,
and we need as many allies as possible.
We should be willing to discuss the insecurities that many people have
about homosexuality. When I say “insecurities,” I mean the fear that
they are some kind of threat to our manhood. I can understand this
fear. Because of the long conditioning process which builds insecurity
in the American male, homosexuality might produce certain hang-ups in
us. I have hang-ups myself about male homosexuality. But on the other
hand, I have no hang-up about female homosexuality. And that is a
phenomenon in itself. I think it is probably because male
homosexuality is a threat to me and female homosexuality is not.
We should be careful about using those terms that might turn our
friends off. The terms “? ” and “punk” should be deleted from our
vocabulary, and especially we should not attach names normally
designed for homosexuals to men who are enemies of the people, such as
Nixon or Mitchell. Homosexuals are not enemies of the people.
We should try to form a working coalition with the ? liberation and
women’s liberation groups. We must always handle social forces in the
most appropriate manner".
-
rusty shackleford wrote: »Maximus Rex wrote: »MONTEGO BAY, Jamaica (AP) http://news.yahoo.com/jamaica-transgender-teen-murdered-mob-070446416.html
— Dwayne Jones was relentlessly teased in high school for being effeminate until he dropped out. His father not only kicked him out of the house at the age of 14 but also helped jeering neighbors push the youngster from the rough Jamaican slum where he grew up.
By age 16, the teenager was dead — beaten, stabbed, shot and run over by a car when he showed up at a street party dressed as a woman. His mistake: confiding to a friend that he was attending a "straight" party as a girl for the first time in his life.
"When I saw Dwayne's body, I started shaking and crying," said Khloe, one of three transgender friends who shared a derelict house with the teenager in the hills above the north coast city of Montego Bay. Like many transgender and ? people in Jamaica, Khloe wouldn't give a full name out of fear.
"It was horrible. It was so, so painful to see him like that."
.... besides murdering their neighbors in cold blood on a daily bases because white politicians order them too..
.. whats next? a celebration commemorating the 50th year anniversary of a civil rights they don't actually have??
"During the past few years strong movements have developed among women and among homosexuals seeking their liberation. There has been some uncertainty about how to relate to these movements.
Whatever your personal opinions and your insecurities about
homosexuality and the various liberation movements among homosexuals
and women (and I speak of the homosexuals and women as oppressed
groups), we should try to unite with them in a revolutionary fashion.
I say ” whatever your insecurities are” because as we very well know,
sometimes our first instinct is to want to hit a homosexual in the
mouth, and want a woman to be quiet. We want to hit a homosexual in
the mouth because we are afraid that we might be homosexual; and we
want to hit the women or shut her up because we are afraid that she
might castrate us, or take the nuts that we might not have to start
with.
We must gain security in ourselves and therefore have respect and
feelings for all oppressed people. We must not use the racist attitude
that the White racists use against our people because they are Black
and poor. Many times the poorest White person is the most racist
because he is afraid that he might lose something, or discover
something that he does not have. So you’re some kind of a threat to
him. This kind of psychology is in operation when we view oppressed
people and we are angry with them because of their particular kind of
behavior, or their particular kind of deviation from the established
norm.
Remember, we have not established a revolutionary value system; we are
only in the process of establishing it. I do not remember our ever
constituting any value that said that a revolutionary must say
offensive things towards homosexuals, or that a revolutionary should
make sure that women do not speak out about their own particular kind
of oppression. As a matter of fact, it is just the opposite: we say
that we recognize the women’s right to be free. We have not said much
about the homosexual at all, but we must relate to the homosexual
movement because it is a real thing. And I know through reading, and
through my life experience and observations that homosexuals are not
given freedom and liberty by anyone in the society. They might be the
most oppresed people in the society.
And what made them homosexual? Perhaps it’s a phenomenon that I don’t
understand entirely. Some people say that it is the decadence of
capitalism. I don’t know if that is the case; I rather doubt it. But
whatever the case is, we know that homosexuality is a fact that
exists, and we must understand it in its purest form: that is, a
person should have the freedom to use his body in whatever way he
wants.
That is not endorsing things in homosexuality that we wouldn’t view as
revolutionary. But there is nothing to say that a homosexual cannot
also be a revolutionary. And maybe I’m now injecting some of my
prejudice by saying that “even a homosexual can be a revolutionary.”
Quite the contrary, maybe a homosexual could be the most
revolutionary.
When we have revolutionary conferences, rallies, and demonstrations,
there should be full participation of the ? liberation movement and
the women’s liberation movement. Some groups might be more
revolutionary than others. We should not use the actions of a few to
say that they are all reactionary or counterrevolutionary, because
they are not.
We should deal with the factions just as we deal with any other group
or party that claims to be revolutionary. We should try to judge,
somehow, whether they are operating in a sincere revolutionary fashion
and from a really oppressed situation. (And we will grant that if they
are women they are probably oppressed.) If they do things that are
unrevolutionary or counterrevolutionary, then criticize that action.
If we feel that the group in spirit means to be revolutionary in
practice, but they make mistakes in interpretation of the
revolutionary philosophy, or they do not understand the dialectics of
the social forces in operation, we should criticize that and not
criticize them because they are women trying to be free. And the same
is true for homosexuals. We should never say a whole movement is
dishonest when in fact they are trying to be honest. They are just
making honest mistakes. Friends are allowed to make mistakes. The
enemy is not allowed to make mistakes because his whole existence is a
mistake, and we suffer from it. But the women’s liberation front and
? liberation front are our friends, they are our potential allies,
and we need as many allies as possible.
We should be willing to discuss the insecurities that many people have
about homosexuality. When I say “insecurities,” I mean the fear that
they are some kind of threat to our manhood. I can understand this
fear. Because of the long conditioning process which builds insecurity
in the American male, homosexuality might produce certain hang-ups in
us. I have hang-ups myself about male homosexuality. But on the other
hand, I have no hang-up about female homosexuality. And that is a
phenomenon in itself. I think it is probably because male
homosexuality is a threat to me and female homosexuality is not.
We should be careful about using those terms that might turn our
friends off. The terms “? ” and “punk” should be deleted from our
vocabulary, and especially we should not attach names normally
designed for homosexuals to men who are enemies of the people, such as
Nixon or Mitchell. Homosexuals are not enemies of the people.
We should try to form a working coalition with the ? liberation and
women’s liberation groups. We must always handle social forces in the
most appropriate manner".
Most of the murder victims in jamaica die at the hands of police not normal criminals and white politicans in jamaica have not ordered anything in jamaica since the 60's unless they are at a hotel. most black jamaicans don't know who huey is and if he supported homosexuality we most likely don't want to know who he is.
-
youtube.com/watch?v=_lBf2UULWJY
^^^sounds like the PNP & the JLP are still the dictators of division to me..
-
rusty shackleford wrote: »
youtube.com/watch?v=_lBf2UULWJY
^^^sounds like the PNP & the JLP are still the dictators of division to me..
That does not have ? to do with anything you posted america has the biggest drug and gang problem in the world and your political system is also corrupt. Stop ? trolling.