'Bill Cosby Show’ Actress Claims Comedian ? Her In New Lawsuit
Options
Comments
-
Well looks like all those capes for cosby looking kinda suss now
-
Shizlansky wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »All this hate just because he told you to pull your pants up. Sad.
He should have took his own advice. Him having his pants down is why he's in this ? now
Are you perfect?
This is a dumb argument because nobody is perfect and therefore nobody should "judge" anyone for anything. No I'm not perfect but I'm also not traveling the country being a hypocrite telling people how to make their lives better. -
babelipsss wrote: »Bill Cosby is getting railroaded!
Nah if he hadn't been on his moral crusades while ? a ton of woman and having out of wedlock kids you could say that. He brought this on himself
Wait so because he had side kids that means he deserves to go to jail for rapes that no one can prove?
It wouldn't be as easy for people to believe if Cosby had lived up to the standard and image he put out for decades. Don't be dense. You knew what my post meant -
Put the ? on the phone
Tell her take the pill
-
Who said they couldn't? Just because some people can doesn't mean everybody can. -
Who said they couldn't? Just because some people can doesn't mean everybody can.
Those people are idiots and probably wouldn't be much help anyway if they can't -
babelipsss wrote: »All this hate just because he told you to pull your pants up. Sad.
On a side note, these charges are a bit telling in the context of the recent political discussions about Trump going after Bill Clinton. His rap sheet is just as long as Cosby's, and yet people cape for him like no else. Why is one Bill C. a pariah, and the other "beloved"? With Cosby it's ok to bring up 20 year sold allegations, but with Clinton who flatout lied on camera to America....it's "old news". Just kinda funny.
-
-
babelipsss wrote: »All this hate just because he told you to pull your pants up. Sad.
Nah it's deeper than that ,some black people felt bill Cosby was seating on top of his high horse looking down on them when he was saying those comments,now that accusations of him drugging and ? women is coming out it makes him look like a monster.Like how can you talk about stop sagging your pants and you out there ? women. -
babelipsss wrote: »All this hate just because he told you to pull your pants up. Sad.
Nah it's deeper than that ,some black people felt bill Cosby was seating on top of his high horse looking down on them when he was saying those comments,now that accusations of him drugging and ? women is coming out it makes him look like a monster.Like how can you talk about stop sagging your pants and you out there ? women.
Or on a basic level how he out here criticizing the state of the black family and absentee parents when he got out of wedlock kids who never knew him because he paid the mothers off -
babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it. -
Shizlansky wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »All this hate just because he told you to pull your pants up. Sad.
He should have took his own advice. Him having his pants down is why he's in this ? now
Are you perfect?
That's how you defend a serial ? ? Who needs Johnny Cochran? @BillCosby holla at this man for your defense team. -
5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this. -
5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this.
5th Letter- Hey police SneakDZA was involved in the murder of Notorious B.I.G
Police- do you have proof?
5th Letter-Nah but that ? did it.
Police- If SneakDZA can't prove his innocence then we'll have no other choice but to lock him up.
5th Letter- take my word for it he did it. -
Honestly the best thing Bill Cosby can do for himself right now is die. I don't think he ? all those ? but I believe he ? a couple
-
5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this.
This is kind of a semantics discussion you guys are having.
I think you both know that though. -
Hmm.....
-
Honestly the best thing Bill Cosby can do for himself right now is die. I don't think he ? all those ? but I believe he ? a couple
Pretty much.
his defense must have been better than Mayweathers cause he aint get slapped once.. my bad he drugged all 72 of them without their consent -
thefabmd2dc wrote: »Well looks like all those capes for cosby looking kinda suss now
How so? -
babelipsss wrote: »Bill Cosby is getting railroaded!
Nah if he hadn't been on his moral crusades while ? a ton of woman and having out of wedlock kids you could say that. He brought this on himself
Wait so because he had side kids that means he deserves to go to jail for rapes that no one can prove?
It wouldn't be as easy for people to believe if Cosby had lived up to the standard and image he put out for decades. Don't be dense. You knew what my post meant
I'm not the one being dense here -
babelipsss wrote: »All this hate just because he told you to pull your pants up. Sad.
This is what it comes down to
-
Also I want to add.
DON'T LET THIS COSBY ? GET FOLKS OFF TRACK IN REGARDS TO TAMIR RICE AND THE NEW ? THAT HAPPENED IN CHICAGO WITH THAT INNOCENT LADY BEING MURDERED!!!
? ! I was really struggling with being able to process two different current events at the same time so thanks for this post!
Very helpful!
-
ThaNubianGod wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »All this hate just because he told you to pull your pants up. Sad.
On a side note, these charges are a bit telling in the context of the recent political discussions about Trump going after Bill Clinton. His rap sheet is just as long as Cosby's, and yet people cape for him like no else. Why is one Bill C. a pariah, and the other "beloved"? With Cosby it's ok to bring up 20 year sold allegations, but with Clinton who flatout lied on camera to America....it's "old news". Just kinda funny.
You have proof of this? -
5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this.
That's how the legal system works ace -
5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this.
That's how the legal system works ace
So why is your ? ? being prosecuted then?