3 Chicago Pigs Charged With Conspiracy in Laquan McDonald Case…

Options
stringer bell
stringer bell Members Posts: 26,212 ✭✭✭✭✭
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/27/us/chicago-officers-indicted-laquan-mcdonald-shooting.html
3 Chicago Officers Charged With Conspiracy in Laquan McDonald Case

CHICAGO — Three longtime police officers were charged on Tuesday in connection with the death of Laquan McDonald, the black teenager whose fatal shooting in 2014 at the hands of a white Chicago officer ignited intense scrutiny over police conduct and transparency.

Unlike the officers accused in a series of police shooting trials that have unfolded around the country in recent weeks, those charged here did not fire their weapons. Their crimes, prosecutors said, stemmed from their actions after the shooting. The three officers, two of whom have since left the force, are accused of covering up for Jason Van ? , the police officer who fired the lethal shots that night, in an effort to protect him from being investigated and charged, court documents show.

The officers were indicted on state felony counts of conspiracy, official misconduct and obstruction of justice. Among the claims were that they provided false reports about how Mr. McDonald, 17, behaved when he encountered Officer Van ? on a Southwest Side street one evening in October 2014; and that the officers went so far as to work together to sidestep interviewing at least three witnesses whose accounts of events would have conflicted with the official police version.

“These defendants lied about what occurred during a police-involved shooting in order to prevent independent criminal investigators from learning the truth,” said Patricia Brown Holmes, a special prosecutor who announced the new charges. “The indictment makes clear that it is unacceptable to obey an unofficial code of silence.”


The officers, who are scheduled for arraignments next month, were not taken into custody, and representatives for them could not be reached. Leaders of Chicago’s Fraternal Order of Police, the union representing rank-and-file officers, declined to comment, saying they had not reviewed the indictment. Eddie Johnson, who was named police superintendent in the aftermath of the McDonald case, and has said the department had cooperated with prosecutors, said he remained committed to setting new policies “to prevent an incident like this from happening again.”

In late 2015, Officer Van ? was charged with murder in the shooting on the same day that city officials released long-awaited dashboard camera video of the episode to comply with a court order. No trial date has been set for Officer Van ? , who has pleaded not guilty to murder and said he feared for his life when he fired the shots. He is on unpaid suspension while awaiting trial.

The video set off night after night of demonstrations across Chicago and led to the removal of the city’s police superintendent. It also prompted a broad investigation by the Justice Department into the Chicago Police Department, its treatment of black residents and what some in Chicago have long described as a “code of silence” between officers.

On the evening of the shooting, numerous police officers had responded to a 911 call of a man with a knife trying to break into vehicles. Among half a dozen officers who were following Mr. McDonald, either on foot or in squad cars, Officer Van ? was the only one to fire his gun.

But other officers — including the three charged on Tuesday — backed up Officer Van ? ’s account that Mr. McDonald had moved menacingly toward him with a knife and swung the weapon. The dashboard video contradicted those accounts, and showed Mr. McDonald, who was clutching a knife, seeming to veer away from the police when Officer Van ? began firing his weapon. The shooting continued as Mr. McDonald lay crumpled on the street.

Charged are Detective David March, a police veteran of more than 30 years, who was assigned to investigate the shooting immediately after it occurred and ultimately deemed it justified; Patrol Officer Joseph Walsh, who had spent about 20 years as an officer and was Officer Van ? ’s partner on the night of the shooting; and Thomas Gaffney, also a patrol officer with approximately two decades of experience on the force, who was also at the scene of the shooting.

Mr. March and Mr. Walsh are no longer Chicago police employees, according to a department spokesman, who did not specify how or when they left the force. Officer Gaffney was suspended after being charged with a felony. If convicted on all counts, the officers could each face more than 10 years in prison.

Comments

  • Undefeatable
    Undefeatable Members Posts: 1,970 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Good.

    This (charging officers who lie to back up their colleagues who ? or injure citizens) needs to happen much more.
  • Rasta.
    Rasta. Members Posts: 9,342 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Good.

    This (charging officers who lie to back up their colleagues who ? or injure citizens) needs to happen much more.

    Until they lock these cops up, ain't nothing good.
  • rebootx1
    rebootx1 Members Posts: 961 ✭✭✭✭
    edited June 2017
    Options
    Don't be fooled these guys are scapegoats for the mayor who hid the whole case for a year due to reelection year
  • Undefeatable
    Undefeatable Members Posts: 1,970 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Rasta. wrote: »
    Good.

    This (charging officers who lie to back up their colleagues who ? or injure citizens) needs to happen much more.

    Until they lock these cops up, ain't nothing good.

    If cops can't count on other officers covering up for them, doesn't that help things at least a little?
  • Trillfate
    Trillfate Members Posts: 24,008 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Those 3 officers have 100 combined years of experience in destroying black lives
  • The Lonious Monk
    The Lonious Monk Members Posts: 26,258 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    rebootx1 wrote: »
    Don't be fooled these guys are scapegoats for the mayor who hid the whole case for a year due to reelection year

    They aren't scapegoats. The lied and tried to cover up ? too. They may not be the highest on the food chain, but they need to get punished too.
  • D. Morgan
    D. Morgan Members Posts: 11,662 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Rasta. wrote: »
    Good.

    This (charging officers who lie to back up their colleagues who ? or injure citizens) needs to happen much more.

    Until they lock these cops up, ain't nothing good.

    Exactly!!

    Charging don't mean ? if they always walk in the end.

    Once the police start having to do time for their crimes like damn near everybody else then ? will change but until then this ain't nothing but for show.
  • dnyce215
    dnyce215 Members Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    D. Morgan wrote: »
    Rasta. wrote: »
    Good.

    This (charging officers who lie to back up their colleagues who ? or injure citizens) needs to happen much more.

    Until they lock these cops up, ain't nothing good.

    Exactly!!

    Charging don't mean ? if they always walk in the end.

    Once the police start having to do time for their crimes like damn near everybody else then ? will change but until then this ain't nothing but for show.

    That is what cops fear the most doing time with the people they locked up
  • marc123
    marc123 Members Posts: 16,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    its kills me when cops get mad when ppl dont snitch, yet they dont snitch on ? cops. smh
  • D. Morgan
    D. Morgan Members Posts: 11,662 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    marc123 wrote: »
    its kills me when cops get mad when ppl dont snitch, yet they dont snitch on ? cops. smh

    This what I found so hypocritical and funny about the police and prosecutors rants against that "stop snitching" ? some years back.


  • stringer bell
    stringer bell Members Posts: 26,212 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/laquanmcdonald/ct-laquan-mcdonald-shooting-charges-20170627-story.html
    The indictment stopped short of criminally charging department higher-ups in the alleged cover-up even though several had been recommended for firing by the city Inspector General's Office for their actions.

    The charges noted, however, that several undisclosed supervisors who completed or approved some of the falsified police reports.

    At an afternoon news conference, Holmes said that the grand jury probe continues but declined to say whether others could still be charged.

    "We will follow all roads where they lead, and we will seek the truth," Holmes told reporters.

    The most serious charge — obstruction — carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, prosecutors said. The three officers are scheduled to be arraigned on July 10 at the Leighton Criminal Court Building.

    A representative of the Fraternal Order of Police, which represents rank-and-file officers, said it had not reviewed the indictment and declined comment.
    It was not known if any of the three officers have criminal defense attorneys.

    But In a statement emailed through a publicist Tuesday night, attorney Daniel Herbert, who represents Van ? , blasted the indictment as a political effort to silence witnesses in his murder case and prevent a fair trial.

    "Apparently, the rule of law is trumped by special interest groups and politicians," he said.

    Herbert also shifted blame to the police command staff, saying that if the allegations are true they must be part of the conspiracy as well since "they were aware of the reports and video when they signed off on the shooting."


    Critics who have long fought to get the city to acknowledge the code of silence said Tuesday that the charges could mark a significant milestone in ongoing efforts to reform a police culture that many have labeled among the worst in the country.

    "This does really send a message that you could be charged just for sitting back even if you aren't the primary actor," said Christopher Smith, an attorney who represented two former officers who alleged they were ostracized for trying to blow the whistle on the code of silence. "That gives good officers the excuse to come forward and say I am not going to risk my family, risk my job."

    Civil rights lawyers who pushed for a special prosecutor in the hot-button case praised the charges, even if department higher-ups weren't indicted.

    "The indictment may not go high enough as it stands right now," said G. Flint Taylor of the People's Law Office. "But it certainly is a historic and significant even in terms of criminally charging police officers who engage in a code of silence."

    Prosecutors have said Van ? was less than an hour into his overnight shift when a radio call reported the 17-year-old McDonald had been caught breaking into trucks and stealing radios in a parking lot.

    Responding first to the scene in their police SUV, Gaffney and his partner said over the radio that McDonald was walking away with a knife in his hand, according to police reports. Gaffney, who was driving, tried to block McDonald's path, but the teen popped the tire on their squad car with the knife, the reports said.

    Arriving on the scene in the 4100 block of South Pulaski Road, Van ? and Walsh got out of their marked Chevrolet Tahoe with their guns drawn. Van ? took at least one step toward the teen and opened fire from about 10 feet away within seconds after exiting the squad car, prosecutors said.

    The video showed McDonald's arm ? as he spun around and fell to the street. As he lay motionless, Van ? emptied his gun and was in the act of reloading when his partner kicked away the knife and told him to hold his fire, prosecutors said.

    The indictment announced Tuesday alleged that March, Walsh and Gaffney each made false police reports, ignored contrary evidence and obstructed justice "to shield" Van ? from criminal investigation and prosecution.

    Van ? himself -- identified in the indictment only as Individual A -- was an active participant in the conspiracy, the indictment alleged.

    The charges alleged the officers coordinated their efforts with Van ? "and others known and unknown to the special grand jury," writing virtually identical reports to make it appear that McDonald's actions were justified.

    Among the false claims cited by the officers, according to the indictment, were that McDonald injured Van ? ; that McDonald swung his knife around and raised his arm as if to attack; and that McDonald attempted to get back up off the ground as Van ? continued to fire.

    Despite what the video captured, one report authored by Walsh stated the footage "was viewed and found to be consistent with the accounts of all the witnesses," the indictment charged.

    The defendants also failed to interview at least three witnesses to the shooting whose accounts differed from those of officers, according to the charges. In addition, the indictment alleged the officers deleted or failed to preserve communications with each other.

    "The co-conspirators understood that public airing of the events surrounding Laquan McDonald's killing, including the video recordings, would inexorably lead to a thorough criminal investigation," the indictment said.

    March was slated to testify Wednesday at a hearing in Van ? 's murder case.

    The Inspector General's Office had recommended that 11 officers – from rank-and-file patrol officers to command-level personnel – be fired for making false statements exaggerating the threat posed by McDonald.

    As a result of those recommendations, police Superintendent Eddie Johnson is seeking to fire four officers – none of whom were indicted. The inspector general had recommended that both March, 58, and Walsh, 48, be fired, but both resigned before any action could be taken against them. Gaffney, 43, who remained on the force, was suspended without pay after word of his indictment Tuesday, a police spokesman said.

    In a prepared statement Tuesday, Johnson said the department has "fully cooperated" with the special prosecutor and reiterated his goal to put in place new and improved policies for the department.


    "The shooting of Laquan McDonald forever changed the Chicago Police Department, and I am committed to implementing policies and training to prevent an incident like this from happening again," said Johnson.

    The indictments are the latest consequence of a shooting that threw policing and politics into upheaval 19 months ago.

    Mayor Rahm Emanuel fought against releasing the video for more than a year before a Cook County judge ordered it publicized in November 2015.
    The video touched off angry, prolonged protests, particularly among African-Americans with longstanding grievances about unfair treatment by Chicago police.

    A few days after the video's release, the U.S. Department of Justice announced it was investigating whether the Police Department had systematically violated citizens' civil rights.

    Emanuel, meanwhile, pressed changes designed to get ahead of those the federal authorities were expected to seek. He has moved to overhaul the city's main police disciplinary agency, reworked the department's use of force rules and expanded the use of Tasers and body cameras, among other changes.

    About six months ago, the Justice Department concluded its investigation, issuing a stinging report criticizing the Police Department from top to bottom, calling Chicago's cops badly trained, lackadaisically supervised, rarely disciplined and prone to using force, particularly against minorities.

    The report also alleged that the code of silence pervades the department, protecting cops from the consequences of their actions, with little threat of discipline for officers who lie.



  • stringer bell
    stringer bell Members Posts: 26,212 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    While the DOJ investigation sought to enter a consent decree with the city, Emanuel backed away from his pledge to do so earlier this month, instead pressing a plan for an independent monitor to oversee changes without a judge's supervision.

    Meanwhile, the city has declined to make public Inspector General Joseph Ferguson's report on the shooting. But thousands of pages of records of that probe obtained by the Tribune months ago raise questions about Johnson's response to the inspector general's findings against top command officers.

    The documents revealed that Ferguson recommended firing Chief of Detectives Eugene Roy and Deputy Chief David McNaughton in addition to numerous lower-ranking officers. Ferguson found that Roy, who had supervised the department's investigation into McDonald's shooting, was "incompetent in the performance of his duties."

    But Johnson never acted on the recommendation. Instead, Roy quietly stepped down as he neared the mandatory age for retirement. McNaughton, the highest-ranking officer at the scene of McDonald's shooting, also since retired.

    The records of Ferguson's investigation also detailed a meeting at police headquarters among the top brass about 10 days after the McDonald shooting. Among those at the meeting was Johnson, then a deputy chief who was later promoted to superintendent after former Superintendent Garry McCarthy was fired days after the release of the video.

    Of that meeting, Lt. Osvaldo Valdez told the Inspector General's office, "Everyone agreed that Officer Van ? used the force necessary to eliminate the threat, and that's pretty much it."

    Through a spokesman, Johnson has disputed that characterization of the meeting but said little more in public about the matter since it was reported by the Tribune in December.

    In his interviews with the inspector general's office, March said the department leadership's stance on the shooting shifted after the video was released and that no one had "voiced any reservations or concerns" to him at the time of his investigation.

    "I was informed the entire command staff concurred with the findings and conclusions of my investigation," he told investigators. He also defended his work and the accuracy of the statements of other officers, as well as McDonald's shooting.

    "Is it really being suggested that the police should have done nothing and permitted Laquan McDonald to continue on his way and not stop him?" March asked.

    The inspector general also found that Walsh filed false department reports and made inaccurate statements to detectives and disciplinary investigators. Ferguson noted that Walsh told detectives that McDonald advanced on officers, swung the knife and tried to get up as Van ? pelted him with bullets.

    He also faulted Walsh for failing to ensure that his police vehicle's video and audio recording system was functioning; the car Walsh rode in that night failed to record audio, and its microphone was not connected to a charger.
  • StoneColdMikey
    StoneColdMikey Members, Moderators Posts: 33,543 Regulator
    Options
    Guarantee the guys above them also apart of the coverup . But I bet they don't get charged